Skip to main content

Security report for meetjinn.com

Jinn · E-commerce · Latvia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MeetJinn is a specialized e-commerce logistics and fulfillment company founded in 2021, offering warehousing, inventory management, order fulfillment, shipping, and SaaS-based warehouse management solutions. The company targets e-commerce businesses seeking to scale operations efficiently by outsourcing fulfillment tasks. The website is professionally designed using the Tilda CMS platform, with a clear structure and mobile optimization, supporting a positive user experience. Technically, the site employs modern tracking and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel, integrated with a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and domain registration protections, although improvements like DNSSEC and additional security headers are recommended. Overall, the site reflects a trustworthy and credible business presence with room for enhanced transparency in security policies and contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching meetjinn.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MeetJinn operates in the e-commerce and transportation sectors, providing essential logistics and fulfillment services that include storage, inventory control, pick and pack, shipping, and returns management. Their business model is B2B, focusing on e-commerce merchants who require efficient order processing and delivery solutions. The company leverages technology through a SaaS platform to enable remote warehouse management, positioning itself as a modern and tech-savvy player in the fulfillment market. The domain age and registration data align with the company's founding year, supporting legitimacy. The absence of direct contact emails and phone numbers on the site suggests a preference for contact via web forms, which is common in modern service businesses. The company maintains a Facebook presence, indicating some social media engagement. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the domain data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and domain status flags preventing unauthorized domain changes. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose DNS queries to spoofing attacks. The site lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are important for transparency and trust in the logistics industry. The use of third-party tracking scripts is managed with a cookie consent banner, supporting GDPR compliance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Recommendations include adding security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, publishing a security policy, and enabling DNSSEC to strengthen the security posture further.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a clear Terms of Service and Security Policy page to improve transparency and legal compliance.
  3. Add explicit security headers (CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to harden the website against common attacks.
  4. Provide direct contact information for security incidents (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses).
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and tracking scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jinn
Description
Jinn is your e-commerce logistics and fulfillment partner. They provide warehousing facilities, product fulfillment, stock management, pick and pack facilities, global delivery services, returns management and technology focused order fulfillment solutions for e-commerce and product focused businesses.
Key services
Fulfillment Solutions, Inventory Management, Storage & Warehousing, Shipping & Transportation, Jinn SAAS Management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.10.2, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Facebook Pixel, Tilda CMS scripts and styles
Frameworks
Tilda website builder
Platforms
Tilda
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent with opt-in
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads (AW-11030098717)
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses Tilda CMS and hosting with GoDaddy domain registrar.
  2. Clear focus on e-commerce fulfillment and logistics services.
  3. Cookie consent banner present with configurable settings.
  4. No explicit Terms of Service page found.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML; contact is via form.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. Use of modern tracking and advertising tools with basic privacy compliance.
  9. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a recommended security improvement.
  10. Website is mobile optimized and has good SEO metadata.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Tilda CMS platform, utilizing jQuery 1.10.2 and various Tilda-specific scripts for animations, menus, and lazy loading. It integrates Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Facebook Pixel for analytics and advertising. The site uses external fonts from Google Fonts and hosts static assets on Tilda's CDN. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and preconnect hints for faster resource fetching. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and accessible navigation menus. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting appears stable with GoDaddy as the domain registrar and Tilda's CDN for content delivery. Technical risks include the use of an older jQuery version and lack of DNSSEC, which could be addressed in future updates.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with meetjinn.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review meetjinn.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.