Skip to main content

Security report for medcorpinc.com

Medcorpinc · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Medcorpinc is a small agriculture-focused company with over 20 years of experience providing sustainable farming solutions and fresh produce. The website presents a professional and consistent brand focused on organic farming, fresh vegetables, and related agricultural services. The technical infrastructure uses modern front-end technologies such as Bootstrap, AOS, and Swiper for a responsive and visually appealing user experience. However, the site lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is moderate with no visible security headers or advanced protections, and no explicit incident response or security policies are published. Privacy compliance is strong with a comprehensive privacy policy and consent checkbox for newsletter subscriptions, but no cookie policy or consent mechanism is present. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy but could improve in security and contact transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching medcorpinc.com

This scan found 14 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
50
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention medcorpinc.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for medcorpinc.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Medcorpinc operates in the agriculture sector, targeting consumers and businesses interested in sustainable and organic farming products and services. Their business model combines service offerings such as planting, mulching, and watering with direct sales of fresh vegetables. The company leverages testimonials as trust indicators but lacks visible certifications or extensive contact information. The website suggests a focus on quality and sustainability, positioning Medcorpinc as a reliable small player in the agriculture market. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the site content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with use of HTTPS assumed but not confirmed. No security headers such as CSP or HSTS are detected, and forms lack anti-CSRF tokens. The privacy policy is comprehensive and GDPR compliant, indicating awareness of data protection requirements. However, absence of incident response contact channels and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits security maturity. The site does not use cookies, reducing tracking risks but also missing cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration and enforce HSTS.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Introduce anti-CSRF tokens in all forms to prevent cross-site request forgery attacks.
  4. Add a cookie policy and consent mechanism if cookies or tracking technologies are introduced.
  5. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Medcorpinc
Description
Medcorpinc is an agriculture-focused company with over 20 years of experience providing sustainable farming solutions, fresh produce, and agricultural services such as planting, mulching, plowing, mowing, seeding, watering, and vegetable selling.
Key services
Planting, Mulching, Plowing, Mowing, Seeding, Watering, Fresh Vegetables, Vegetable selling
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Swiper Carousel, GLightbox, Font Awesome
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS assumed but not confirmed from HTML content
  • Forms use POST method with content-type application/x-www-form-urlencoded
  • Consent checkbox for newsletter subscription

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is agriculture-focused despite domain name suggesting medical corporation.
  2. No phone numbers or physical addresses found on the site.
  3. Privacy policy is detailed and GDPR compliant.
  4. No cookie policy or consent mechanism present.
  5. Newsletter subscription and unsubscribe forms present with consent checkbox.
  6. No visible social media links or official company phone numbers.
  7. No terms of service page found.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  9. No certifications or security frameworks mentioned.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with Bootstrap for responsive design, AOS for animations, Swiper for carousels, and Font Awesome for icons. The site is mobile optimized and has clear navigation. However, SEO is basic with minimal meta descriptions and no Open Graph or structured data markup. Performance is moderate with multiple external font and icon libraries loaded. Accessibility features are basic with no ARIA landmarks or advanced semantic markup detected. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident. Technical debt appears low but security and SEO improvements are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with medcorpinc.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review medcorpinc.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.