Skip to main content

Security report for material-tailwind.com

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Material Tailwind is a technology-focused website offering an open-source Tailwind CSS components library with React and Material Design styling. It targets web developers and UI/UX designers seeking to accelerate frontend development with ready-to-use components. The site promotes both free and PRO versions, indicating a freemium business model. The website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and uses modern web technologies including React, Next.js, and Tailwind CSS, supported by analytics tools like Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises questions about domain legitimacy, though the professional site content and active GitHub presence support its credibility. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking explicit security headers and policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is a valuable resource for frontend developers but should improve transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching material-tailwind.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention material-tailwind.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
11
Employees
0
Customers
11
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
36%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for material-tailwind.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Material Tailwind occupies a niche in the frontend development ecosystem, leveraging the popularity of Tailwind CSS and React. Its competitive advantage lies in combining Material Design aesthetics with Tailwind's utility-first CSS approach. The business model includes free open-source components and a paid PRO version, targeting individual developers and teams. High npm install counts and GitHub stars indicate strong community adoption and growth potential. The presence of Discord and GitHub links suggests an engaged user base and active support channels. No direct business registration or contact info is provided, which may limit enterprise trust but suits open-source community norms. The company appears small but focused on technology and developer tools.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and loads scripts asynchronously to reduce risk. However, no explicit security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) were detected in the HTML content, which could expose the site to certain web attacks. No contact information for security incidents or vulnerability disclosure policies were found, indicating limited incident response readiness. Tracking via Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel is present, but privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are missing, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and providing incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency by publishing WHOIS registrant information or justifying privacy protection.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Material Tailwind is a components library that features multiple React & HTML components, all written with Tailwind CSS classes and Material Design guidelines.
Key services
Tailwind CSS components, React components, Material Design styled UI components, PRO version with additional features
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Tailwind CSS, Next.js, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Discord, JSDelivr CDN
Frameworks
React, Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical link https://)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of async loading for analytics scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the HTML content.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the content.
  4. Strong use of modern frontend technologies and frameworks.
  5. Active social presence via GitHub and Discord links.
  6. No explicit security or incident response information provided.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  8. WHOIS data is missing or domain is unregistered, which is unusual.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern tech stack including React and Next.js, styled with Tailwind CSS, and enhanced with Font Awesome icons and Google Fonts. It uses CDN-hosted libraries and asynchronous script loading for performance. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and structured content. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Performance appears moderate with some heavy image assets. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site lacks some advanced security configurations and privacy compliance mechanisms. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with room for security and compliance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with material-tailwind.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review material-tailwind.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.