Skip to main content

Security report for massagroup.vc

Massa Group · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Massa Group is an investment holding company specializing in supporting and funding deep-tech startups across Europe, Israel, Southeast Asia, and the United States. Their business model focuses on providing operational support, networking opportunities, and seed to Series A funding to accelerate early-stage companies. The website presents a professional image with clear information about their portfolio, team, and investment focus, targeting startup founders and investors in the technology sector. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and moderate performance. However, some accessibility features are basic, and there is room for improvement in security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a strong SSL configuration and does not expose sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. The absence of security headers and incident response information are notable gaps. Privacy and cookie policies exist but lack active consent mechanisms, which may impact GDPR compliance. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced with additional best practices. The overall risk assessment is moderate with no critical issues detected. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, adding an incident response contact or policy, and enhancing privacy compliance with cookie consent. These improvements would strengthen trust and security culture while aligning with regulatory expectations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching massagroup.vc

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
45
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention massagroup.vc, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for massagroup.vc right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Massa Group positions itself as a niche investment holding company focused on deep-tech startups, leveraging a network of investors and operational expertise to support early-stage companies. Their portfolio includes recognized startups in sectors like MediaTech, MedTech, CleanTech, and EduTech. The business model combines capital investment with strategic and financial management support, targeting high-growth scalable startups primarily in technology hubs. The company appears to be relatively new (founded in 2021) but maintains a professional digital presence and credible team leadership with LinkedIn profiles. Their partnership ecosystem includes known startups and a web development agency (Digital Karma). Growth indicators include active news updates and a curated portfolio. Revenue streams likely derive from equity stakes and investment returns.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The use of Google Tag Manager is standard for analytics but requires careful configuration to avoid privacy issues. The lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a weakness that could expose the site to clickjacking or content injection risks. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response policies are published, which limits transparency in security management. Privacy compliance is partial, with policies present but no active cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the security maturity is good for a small investment firm but would benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Add a dedicated security policy or incident response page with clear contact channels for reporting vulnerabilities or incidents.
  3. Deploy a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  4. Publish terms of service to clarify user and client agreements and reduce legal risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Massa Group
Description
Massa Group is an investment holding company which purpose is to craft startups and other innovative businesses, seeking their accelerated and sustainable growth.
Key services
Operational support in strategic and financial management, Networking with investors and big companies, Seed and Series A funding
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, Google Tag Manager, Webflow CMS
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well structured.
  2. Focus on deep-tech investment with clear portfolio and team information.
  3. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies present but lack advanced compliance features like consent mechanisms.
  5. No phone contact information found; only email contact provided.
  6. No terms of service page detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, leveraging jQuery 3.5.1 and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The hosting is provided via Webflow's CDN, ensuring reliable delivery and SSL support. The site uses modern CSS and JavaScript with responsive design for mobile devices. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. SEO is supported by appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. However, the absence of security headers and limited accessibility features indicate areas for technical improvement. No forms with sensitive data collection were detected, reducing risk exposure. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could be enhanced with security and compliance best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with massagroup.vc. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review massagroup.vc.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.