Skip to main content

Security report for manillapr.com

Other · Turkey

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website manillapr.com operates as an affiliate-style platform primarily targeting Turkish users interested in betting and casino sites, including illegal gambling platforms. It provides updated entry URLs and bonus information for a wide range of betting sites. The business model focuses on referral traffic to these gambling sites, with no direct gambling services offered. Technically, the site uses Bootstrap 5 and Font Awesome for UI, and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The site is mobile responsive but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is weak, with no visible HTTPS enforcement or security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies present. WHOIS data is missing, raising concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the site presents moderate risk due to its promotion of illegal gambling and lack of compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching manillapr.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention manillapr.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for manillapr.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Manillapr.com occupies a niche in the Turkish online gambling market by aggregating and promoting illegal and licensed betting sites. Its competitive advantage lies in providing updated access links and bonus offers, appealing to users circumventing local gambling restrictions. The business model is affiliate-based, generating revenue through referrals. The site lacks transparency, with no clear company information or contact details, which may hinder trust and regulatory compliance. The extensive use of third-party short URLs suggests an attempt to obfuscate direct links. Growth indicators are unclear due to lack of business data. The partnership ecosystem appears limited to gambling sites, with no evident strategic alliances or certifications.

Security posture

The security maturity of manillapr.com is low. The absence of HTTPS enforcement and security headers exposes users to potential man-in-the-middle attacks and clickjacking risks. No privacy or cookie policies indicate non-compliance with GDPR or similar regulations. The lack of contact information or incident response channels suggests poor readiness for security incidents. The site’s promotion of illegal gambling sites further complicates its risk profile. No evidence of vulnerability management or secure coding practices is visible. Overall, the site is vulnerable to multiple security and compliance issues that could impact user trust and legal standing.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with HSTS to secure user connections and improve trust.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Publish clear contact information and establish incident response procedures.
  4. Conduct security audits and implement security headers to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  5. Increase transparency by providing business registration details and trust indicators.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
manillapr.com olarak bahis sitelerinin yeni giriş adreslerini, bonuslarını ve para yatırma yöntemlerini bahis severlere en kolay ve en hızlı şekilde iletmek için kurulmuştur. Sitemiz sadece bahis sitesi tanıtımı yapmaktadır.
Key services
Listing of illegal and licensed betting sites, Providing updated entry URLs, Bonus information dissemination
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5.0.2, Font Awesome 6.0.0-beta2, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links present
  4. Website heavily promotes illegal gambling sites with affiliate style links
  5. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible unregistered domain or privacy protection
  6. Use of multiple third-party short URLs for external links
  7. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement visible in provided data
  8. Basic technical implementation with Bootstrap and Font Awesome
  9. Google Analytics and Tag Manager used for tracking
  10. Content is in Turkish targeting Turkish gambling audience
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a basic but modern front-end stack with Bootstrap 5 and Font Awesome, ensuring mobile responsiveness and a consistent UI. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are integrated for user tracking. However, the site lacks advanced SEO optimization and accessibility features. No CMS or hosting provider information is available. Performance appears moderate but could be improved with optimization. The use of multiple third-party short URLs for affiliate links may introduce risks and reduce user trust. The absence of HTTPS and security headers is a significant technical deficiency. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but requires modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with manillapr.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review manillapr.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.