Skip to main content

Security report for managed-ip.com

managed IP GmbH · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

managed IP GmbH is a specialized German company offering worldwide domain management and protection services with over 15 years of experience. Their business model focuses on outsourcing domain-related tasks for internal departments such as IT, Marketing, and Legal, providing centralized domain registration and additional value-added services. The company targets businesses requiring professional domain portfolio management and protection. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins like Yoast SEO and Borlabs Cookie for consent management, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and anti-spam measures in place, though some security headers and explicit incident response contacts are missing. The absence of WHOIS registration data reduces domain trustworthiness, but the website content and structure are professional and comprehensive.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching managed-ip.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention managed-ip.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
3
Employees
0
Customers
3
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
67%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for managed-ip.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

managed IP GmbH holds a niche market position as a domain management specialist in Germany, serving corporate clients with domain outsourcing and protection services. Their competitive advantage lies in personalized service, extensive domain expertise, and a holistic approach to domain strategy. Revenue streams likely come from domain registration, management fees, and value-added services such as trademark clearinghouse support and SSL certificates. The company maintains a focused partnership ecosystem with no publicly listed subsidiaries or parent companies. Growth indicators include a well-structured website with detailed service offerings and client testimonials. Strategic observations suggest a stable small-sized enterprise with a strong reputation in its domain niche.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and use of anti-spam honeypot techniques. Cookie consent is managed via a reputable plugin, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the lack of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and absence of a published security policy or incident response contact reduce overall security transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Compliance with GDPR is indicated by the privacy policy and cookie banner. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are limited due to missing explicit information. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be improved with additional transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security hygiene.
  4. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
managed IP GmbH
Description
managed IP ist mit seinem Konzept „Domainabteilung“ seit über 15 Jahren ein spezialisierter Anbieter für die weltweite Domainverwaltung und -schutz. Sie entlasten interne Abteilungen (IT, Marketing, Legal) von Domainaufgaben (Outsourcing) und verbessern den Schutz von Domainnamen online.
Key services
Domainverwaltung weltweit, Domainregistrierung, Domain Zentralisierung, Whois-Update, DNS Infrastruktur & Verwaltung, Domain Portal, Verlängerungen & Rechnungsstellung, Domain Outsourcing, Mehrwertdienste (Admin-C Management, Domainüberwachung, Treuhandservice), Neue TLD Services (TMCH, nTLD Einsprüche)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Avada Theme, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Borlabs Cookie (consent management), Contact Form 7, Honeypot plugin
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of honeypot anti-spam on forms
  • Cookie consent management implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Borlabs Cookie
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is in German with English alternate language available.
  3. No explicit email addresses found in HTML content; contact likely via form or phone.
  4. Phone number clearly provided in footer with German country code.
  5. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
  6. Multiple internal links to detailed service pages and legal pages.
  7. Use of modern WordPress plugins and SEO best practices.
  8. Cookie consent implemented via Borlabs Cookie plugin.
  9. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page.
  10. No explicit privacy officer contact found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Avada theme, supported by plugins including Yoast SEO for search engine optimization, Borlabs Cookie for cookie consent management, Contact Form 7 for forms, and a honeypot plugin for spam prevention. The site loads jQuery and uses modern JavaScript modules for cookie management. Performance is moderate with fixed slider images and some parallax effects. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive menus and layout. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. No hosting provider details were found. Technical risks include potential outdated plugins if not maintained and missing security headers. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with managed-ip.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review managed-ip.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.