Skip to main content

Security report for malloy-law.com

Malloy Law Offices, LLC · Other · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Malloy Law Offices, LLC is a personal injury law firm serving clients primarily in Bethesda, Maryland, Washington D.C., and Virginia. The firm specializes in various personal injury cases including car accidents, catastrophic injuries, premises liability, workers’ compensation, and wrongful death claims. Their website offers a free consultation and prominently features contact information and a client intake form, positioning them as a client-focused regional legal service provider. The firm maintains an active social media presence and uses structured data to enhance search engine visibility. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Gravity Forms for client intake, Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking, Facebook Pixel, and AdRoll for advertising and retargeting. The site is optimized for performance with WP Rocket and includes Google reCAPTCHA for spam protection on forms. Mobile optimization and SEO practices are good, though accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses reCAPTCHA, but lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. No incident response or security policy pages are published, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanism is present. The WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, which slightly reduces trustworthiness, though the site content and business information appear legitimate and professional. Overall, the website demonstrates a solid digital presence for a small legal firm with good business credibility and technical implementation. Improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and transparency around incident response would enhance their security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching malloy-law.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention malloy-law.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
9
Employees
0
Customers
9
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for malloy-law.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Malloy Law Offices operates in the legal services sector with a focus on personal injury law. Their business model centers on client acquisition through free consultations and comprehensive legal representation. The firm targets individuals in the Maryland, Washington D.C., and Virginia regions who have suffered injuries due to others' fault. The website's content and structure suggest a small-sized firm with a regional market position. The firm leverages digital marketing tools and social media to enhance visibility and client engagement. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The presence of testimonials and a professional website supports their credibility and client trust. The lack of WHOIS data may indicate privacy protection or recent domain registration, which should be monitored for legitimacy.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and Google reCAPTCHA is implemented on forms to prevent spam. The use of Honeybadger indicates active error monitoring. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap. No published incident response or security policy pages reduce transparency. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small legal firm but could be improved with better header implementation and privacy controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish an incident response policy and contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Malloy Law Offices, LLC
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Malloy Law Offices, LLC
Description
A personal injury law firm serving Bethesda, Maryland, Washington D.C, and Virginia. Injured due to the fault of another party? You may be entitled to compensation. Contact the personal injury lawyer at Malloy Law Offices, LLC.
Key services
Personal Injury Attorney, Car Accidents, Catastrophic Injury, Premises Liability, Workers’ Compensation, Wrongful Death
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, AdRoll, Honeybadger, WP Rocket, jQuery, Recaptcha
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • Use of Honeybadger for error monitoring
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Form validation and honeypot field present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, AdRoll
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Twitter Ads, Facebook Ads, Google Ads, AdRoll
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, AdRoll Pixel
Marketing tools
Honeybadger, Lawbrokr
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional personal injury law firm site
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and tracking tools
  3. No WHOIS data available, possibly due to domain not registered or privacy protection
  4. No explicit cookie consent mechanism found
  5. Contact form uses Google reCAPTCHA for spam protection
  6. Multiple social media profiles linked
  7. Good SEO and structured data implementation
  8. No visible security headers beyond HTTPS
  9. No incident response or security policy pages found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a well-integrated tech stack including Gravity Forms for data collection, Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics, Facebook Pixel and AdRoll for advertising and retargeting, and Honeybadger for error monitoring. Performance optimizations are implemented via WP Rocket. The site uses modern JavaScript libraries and asynchronous loading for improved speed. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO is enhanced with Yoast SEO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format. However, the hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The absence of explicit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are technical gaps. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-maintained with opportunities for security and privacy improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with malloy-law.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review malloy-law.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.