Skip to main content

Security report for magiceden.io

Magic Eden · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Magic Eden operates a leading NFT marketplace platform that enables users to discover, mint, buy, sell, and trade NFTs and digital collectibles across multiple blockchain networks including Solana, Bitcoin, Ethereum, and others. The platform targets NFT collectors, crypto enthusiasts, and digital asset traders, positioning itself as a comprehensive marketplace with additional services such as minting and swapping. The company was founded in 2021 and is based in the United States. The website reflects a professional and modern digital presence with a strong focus on user experience and multi-chain NFT services. From a technical perspective, Magic Eden employs a modern web technology stack including React, Next.js, and Mantine UI components, supported by Cloudflare for DNS and domain registration. The site is optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, with integrated analytics via RudderStack. SEO and accessibility features are well implemented, contributing to a high-quality user experience. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and domain status protections in place. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no explicit security headers or public security policies were detected in the provided content. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. No contact information or incident response channels are publicly disclosed, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. Overall, Magic Eden presents a trustworthy and professional NFT marketplace with strong business credibility and technical maturity. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security transparency, and contact availability would further strengthen its security posture and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching magiceden.io

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Magic Eden holds a strong market position as a leading NFT marketplace supporting multiple blockchain ecosystems. Its business model revolves around facilitating NFT transactions, minting, and creation, targeting a broad audience of digital asset collectors and traders. The platform's multi-chain approach and additional services like swapping and Bitcoin DeFi indicate a diversified revenue stream and growth potential. The company leverages partnerships with blockchain networks and uses Cloudflare for infrastructure reliability. The absence of explicit privacy and security disclosures suggests areas for operational maturity enhancement. The platform's branding and user interface are consistent and professional, supporting customer trust and engagement.

Security posture

Magic Eden demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain registration protections. However, the lack of DNSSEC, security headers, and public security policies indicates gaps in defense-in-depth and transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file limits external security collaboration. Incident response readiness and contact channels are not publicly available, which could hinder timely handling of security incidents. Compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations is unclear due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Enhancing these areas would improve the overall security culture and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve DNS security.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Implement and publicly disclose security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and general inquiries to enhance trust and responsiveness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Magic Eden
Description
Discover, mint, buy & sell NFTs and digital collectibles on Magic Eden. Explore top collections & mint the latest NFT drops on the leading NFT marketplace.
Key services
NFT discovery, NFT minting, NFT trading, NFT creation, Swap services, Bitcoin DeFi
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Mantine UI, TradingView charts, RudderStack analytics, Cloudflare DNS and registrar
Frameworks
Next.js, Mantine
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
RudderStack
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
RudderStack
Marketing tools
RudderStack
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional NFT marketplace with multi-chain support.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found in the provided HTML content.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  4. Strong branding and consistent design observed.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No explicit security or incident response contact information found.
  8. Website uses HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS but DNSSEC is not enabled.
  9. Analytics usage via RudderStack detected.
  10. No adult or NSFW content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern and scalable infrastructure using Next.js and React frameworks, with Mantine UI for consistent styling. Hosting and DNS are managed by Cloudflare, ensuring performance and availability. The site includes advanced charting via TradingView and analytics through RudderStack, indicating a mature technical ecosystem. Performance and mobile optimization are excellent, supporting a broad user base. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers suggests some technical debt in security hardening. The site lacks explicit CMS identification, likely custom-built or headless. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals effectively but could benefit from enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 71/100Medium23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with magiceden.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review magiceden.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.