Skip to main content

Security report for magecode.lv

Magecode · E-commerce · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Magecode is a specialized e-commerce agency focused on Magento internet store development and maintenance. The company offers a range of services including Magento development, migration, code audits, version upgrades, AWS hosting, and ongoing support. They position themselves as Magento experts with certified developers and an official partnership with Hyvä Themes, targeting businesses seeking high-quality Magento solutions. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and clear navigation, supporting their market position as a niche Magento development expert in Latvia. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and integrates marketing and analytics tools like HubSpot and Google Analytics. Mobile optimization and SEO are well addressed, though accessibility is basic. Security posture is moderate with no visible security headers and no explicit privacy or cookie policies, indicating room for improvement in compliance and security best practices. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, but the website content and trust signals suggest legitimacy. Overall, Magecode presents a credible and professional business with a solid digital presence but should enhance privacy compliance and security configurations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching magecode.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
40
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Magecode operates in the e-commerce sector as a small-sized service provider specializing in Magento platform development and support. Their competitive advantage lies in certified Magento expertise, official partnerships, and a comprehensive service portfolio including AWS hosting and migration. The business model is service-oriented, targeting other businesses needing Magento e-commerce solutions. The company maintains active social media presence and customer testimonials, indicating engagement and trust. Growth indicators include job postings and continuous service offerings. The partnership ecosystem includes Hyvä Themes and AWS certifications, enhancing credibility. Strategic observations suggest Magecode focuses on quality, transparency, and proactivity as core values, positioning them well in the niche Magento development market.

Security posture

Magecode's current security maturity is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and integrates trusted third-party analytics and marketing tools. However, the absence of explicit security headers (such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) and lack of published privacy and cookie policies indicate compliance gaps, particularly with GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, which may impact readiness for security events. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The security culture appears professional but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced transparency. Overall, Magecode should prioritize implementing security headers, privacy compliance documentation, and incident response mechanisms to strengthen their security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance and user consent mechanisms.
  2. Add and configure essential security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to improve site security.
  3. Publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels to enhance transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security training to foster a stronger security culture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Magecode
VAT number
LV40203196820
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Magecode
Description
E-commerce Agency specializing in Magento internet store development and maintenance, offering certified Magento programming, migration, code audits, upgrades, AWS hosting, and support services.
Key services
Magento development, Maintenance and support, Magento migration, Code audits, Magento version upgrades, AWS hosting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.0, jQuery Validate, HubSpot scripts, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Platforms
Magento
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of HTTPS implied by external scripts loaded over HTTPS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and structured data.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented and consistent.
  4. Use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools.
  5. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit, limiting domain trust verification.
  7. Strong branding and professional design with consistent messaging.
  8. No forms detected in the HTML content provided.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a modern but relatively simple technology stack centered on jQuery and HubSpot marketing tools. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking and analytics. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements and good SEO metadata. However, no advanced frameworks or CMS platforms were explicitly detected beyond Magento as the business focus. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple external scripts. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of security headers and privacy compliance documentation suggests areas for modernization. Opportunities exist to improve security configurations, accessibility, and privacy compliance to reduce technical risks impacting business operations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with magecode.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review magecode.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.