Skip to main content

Security report for lyoskin.com

LYOS · E-commerce · Finland

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LYOS is a small Finnish e-commerce skincare brand launched in 2024, offering a playful and natural skincare product line. The website is built on Shopify, leveraging modern e-commerce technologies and third-party integrations such as Judge.me for customer reviews and Facebook Pixel for marketing. The brand has received industry recognition through awards and media features, positioning itself as a niche player in the clean and natural beauty market. Technically, the site is well-implemented with good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and domain protections in place, though DNSSEC is not enabled. Privacy compliance is lacking as no explicit privacy or cookie policies are found, and no consent mechanisms are implemented. Contact information is limited to forms and social media links, with no direct emails or phone numbers published. Overall, LYOS presents a professional and trustworthy online presence but should improve privacy and compliance disclosures to enhance user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lyoskin.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
75
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention lyoskin.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for lyoskin.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LYOS operates in the competitive skincare e-commerce sector with a focus on natural and fun skincare products. Their business model centers on direct online sales via Shopify, supported by customer engagement through reviews and social media. The brand targets skincare enthusiasts looking for effective yet playful products. Recognition in beauty awards and media coverage supports their market positioning. The company appears to be a standalone entity without visible parent or subsidiary relationships. Their partnership ecosystem includes Shopify and Judge.me, essential for platform and customer feedback management. Growth indicators include recent domain registration and active marketing efforts. Strategic observations suggest focusing on expanding privacy compliance and direct contact channels to build deeper customer trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture typical of Shopify-hosted stores, including enforced HTTPS, clientTransferProhibited domain status, and CAPTCHA protection on forms. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of DNSSEC and explicit security policies or incident response contacts indicates room for improvement. Privacy compliance gaps, such as missing privacy and cookie policies and lack of consent mechanisms, pose regulatory risks, especially under GDPR. The use of third-party tracking and marketing scripts is standard but should be accompanied by transparent user consent. Incident response readiness is unclear due to lack of published contacts. Overall, the site is secure but should enhance compliance and transparency to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  3. Implement a cookie consent banner/mechanism to obtain user consent for tracking.
  4. Add a security policy page including incident response contacts (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and integrations for security and privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LYOS
Description
LYOS offers a playful, vibrant skincare product line designed to transform skincare routines into enjoyable experiences. Their products focus on natural, beneficial ingredients with a fun, energetic brand personality.
Key services
Skincare product sales, Customer reviews and engagement, Newsletter subscription
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Shopify, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, Facebook Pixel, Judge.me Reviews, Shopify Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay
Frameworks
Shopify Liquid
Platforms
Shopify
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • clientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Use of Shopify platform security features
  • CAPTCHA protection on forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Shopify Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Pixel
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Judge.me
Marketing tools
Shopify Analytics, Judge.me Reviews
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed Shopify e-commerce store for skincare products.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  3. Contact is primarily via contact form and newsletter subscription; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  4. Social media presence on Instagram and TikTok is prominent.
  5. Use of third-party review system (Judge.me) enhances trust.
  6. No security policy or incident response information published.
  7. HTTPS is enforced with good SSL configuration.
  8. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a minor security gap.
  9. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  10. Tracking and marketing scripts are standard for e-commerce but lack explicit cookie consent mechanism.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Shopify, utilizing its Liquid templating framework and hosted by Instra Corporation Pty Ltd. The tech stack includes modern JavaScript, CSS, and HTML5 with integrations for Facebook Pixel, Judge.me reviews, and Shopify Payments including Apple Pay and Google Pay. Performance is moderate with deferred script loading and responsive design. Accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA roles are present. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. The site uses CDN resources for fonts and assets, enhancing load times. Technical debt appears low, but the site could benefit from enabling DNSSEC and improving privacy-related technical implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lyoskin.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lyoskin.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.