Skip to main content

Security report for lycheeip.com

LycheeProxy · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LycheeProxy operates as a residential IP proxy provider, claiming to be the world's largest in this niche. The website offers proxy network services targeting businesses and developers requiring residential IPs for various applications. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript frameworks and integrates multiple analytics and tracking services such as Google Analytics and TikTok Analytics, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about the domain's legitimacy and ownership transparency. Security posture is limited with no visible security headers or policies, and privacy compliance is minimal due to the lack of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, while the website is functional and professionally designed, the lack of critical trust and compliance elements poses risks.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lycheeip.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself strongly in the proxy service market, focusing on residential IP proxies. Its business model revolves around providing proxy access as a service, targeting a technical audience. The website's content and structure suggest a medium-sized operation with moderate branding consistency. The lack of visible certifications or trust indicators and absence of contact information limit the business credibility. The extensive use of third-party analytics and tracking tools suggests a focus on marketing and user behavior analysis. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data.

Security posture

The security maturity level is low to moderate. The website uses HTTPS (implied by script sources), but no security headers were detected in the provided data. There is no evidence of security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, particularly with GDPR. The use of multiple third-party scripts increases the attack surface. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the analysis, but the lack of security best practices and transparency is a concern.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive WHOIS registration and ensure domain ownership transparency.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  3. Add visible contact information including support and security incident response channels.
  4. Enhance security posture by adding security headers and conducting regular vulnerability assessments.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to improve trust and security culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LycheeProxy
Description
LycheeProxy is a provider of residential IP proxy services, offering a large network of residential IPs for proxy usage.
Key services
Residential IP proxies, Proxy network services
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, TikTok Analytics, Google Analytics, Google Identity Services, Element UI
Frameworks
Vue.js (implied by Element UI usage)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, TikTok Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
TikTok Analytics
Marketing tools
TikTok Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. WHOIS data unavailable or domain not registered.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the content.
  4. Website uses multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts.
  5. No visible security or incident response policies.
  6. Website content is focused on residential IP proxy services.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; content fully accessible.
  8. Technical implementation uses modern JS libraries and frameworks.
  9. No explicit trust or certification badges visible.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages modern front-end technologies including Vue.js (inferred from Element UI usage) and integrates multiple analytics platforms such as Google Analytics and TikTok Analytics. The site appears mobile-optimized with good navigation and design quality. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. However, there is no detected CMS or hosting provider information. The technical implementation lacks visible security headers and compliance features, indicating areas for modernization and risk mitigation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lycheeip.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lycheeip.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.