Skip to main content

Security report for lundelmersandager.dk

Lund Elmer Sandager Advokatpartnerselskab · Other · Denmark

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lund Elmer Sandager is a well-established Danish law firm founded in 2008, specializing in business-oriented legal services. The website reflects a professional and modern approach, targeting businesses and individuals seeking legal advice in Denmark. Their market position is supported by a consistent brand presence and comprehensive service offerings. Technically, the site is built on Drupal 10, integrating modern analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Plausible Analytics, and Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie management. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers could be improved. The WHOIS data aligns well with the business identity, enhancing trustworthiness. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and compliant with privacy regulations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lundelmersandager.dk

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Email security
97
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The firm operates in the legal services sector, focusing on business clients in Denmark. Their business model is professional services with revenue streams likely from legal consulting and representation. The website targets Danish-speaking clients and emphasizes legal expertise and business integration. The presence of detailed cookie management and analytics indicates a mature digital marketing strategy. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, suggesting an independent operation. The firm maintains a strong online presence with consistent branding and trust signals such as GDPR compliance and transparent contact information.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented via Cookiebot. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information was found, which could be enhanced to improve security transparency. The domain registration is consistent and transparent, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the security measures are adequate for a professional services website but could benefit from additional hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate supply chain risks.
  5. Enhance incident response information availability to improve security transparency and readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Lund Elmer Sandager Advokatpartnerselskab
Registration number
CVR: 3228 3934
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lund Elmer Sandager Advokatpartnerselskab
Description
Lund Elmer Sandager er et moderne, erhvervsorienteret advokathus med specialister i forretning mellem mennesker. De tilbyder juridisk rådgivning og advokattjenester.
Key services
Juridisk rådgivning, Advokatydelser
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Plausible Analytics
Frameworks
Drupal
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reputable third-party scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Google Ads conversion tracking, Cookiebot tracking
Marketing tools
LinkedIn Insight Tag, Plausible Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional law firm site with comprehensive cookie and privacy compliance.
  2. Uses modern CMS (Drupal 10) and integrates standard analytics and marketing tools.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with detailed cookie categorization.
  4. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms; content fully accessible.
  5. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and business consistency.
  6. No explicit security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  7. No terms of service page detected in the provided content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by Drupal 10, a modern and widely supported CMS, ensuring a solid technical foundation. Integration with Google Tag Manager, Plausible Analytics, and Cookiebot indicates a mature approach to analytics and privacy compliance. The site shows good mobile responsiveness and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by third-party scripts and consent management overhead. No hosting provider details were explicitly detected. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from performance optimization and enhanced security header implementation to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lundelmersandager.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lundelmersandager.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.