Skip to main content

Security report for lukasmollberg.com

Lukas Mollberg · Other · New Zealand

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lukas Mollberg's website serves as a personal professional platform highlighting his expertise as a writer and author specializing in online gaming and gambling. The site positions him as a niche content creator with a background in semi-professional online poker, targeting potential partners interested in his writing services. The business model is centered on personal branding and professional content creation, with a small-scale operation based in New Zealand. Technically, the website is built on WordPress, utilizing standard themes and jQuery libraries. Hosting is provided by GoDaddy. The site demonstrates moderate performance and basic mobile optimization but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. No advanced frameworks or platforms beyond WordPress are detected. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks DNSSEC and important security headers, which reduces its security posture. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security measures and privacy compliance to improve trust and reduce risk. The content is safe for general audiences, with no adult or explicit material detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lukasmollberg.com

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
32
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website reflects a personal brand focused on writing and authoring within the online gaming and gambling niche. Market positioning is niche and personal, with competitive advantage derived from the author's semi-professional poker experience and writing skills. Revenue streams likely include freelance writing and content partnerships. The target customer segment includes businesses or individuals seeking expertise in gaming-related content. Growth indicators are limited but the site is professionally maintained with active social media links. No formal partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated. Strategically, the site serves as a digital business card to attract collaboration opportunities. The lack of formal business policies and certifications suggests a sole proprietorship or small business model without extensive corporate structure.

Security posture

The security maturity level is basic. HTTPS is enabled, which is mandatory, but DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers are detected, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. There is no evidence of exposed credentials or vulnerabilities in the visible content. Compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Incident response readiness is not demonstrated. The security culture appears minimal, typical for a small personal website. Business impact of current gaps is moderate, mainly related to potential compliance risks and reduced trust from visitors. No critical vulnerabilities or malware detected.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility to improve user experience and SEO.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lukas Mollberg
Description
Professional writer and author specializing in online gaming and gambling. Former semi-professional online poker player with experience blogging about poker.
Key services
Writing, Authoring, Blogging about poker and online gaming
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, PHP (implied by WordPress), CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal professional site for a writer specializing in online gaming and gambling.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided via email and physical address.
  4. No forms detected on the site; no data collection beyond email contact link.
  5. No security headers detected; DNSSEC not enabled.
  6. Site uses WordPress with standard themes and scripts.
  7. No advertising or analytics services detected.
  8. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with the Twenty Sixteen theme and jQuery libraries. Hosting is via GoDaddy. The site loads with moderate performance and basic mobile responsiveness. There is no evidence of advanced frameworks or modern JavaScript libraries. SEO is basic with standard meta tags but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data detected. Accessibility features are minimal but present (e.g., skip links). Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist, especially in security and SEO enhancements. No technical risks such as outdated libraries or broken elements were found.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 45/100High36 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lukasmollberg.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lukasmollberg.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.