Skip to main content

Security report for luckyorange.com

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lucky Orange provides website optimization tools including heatmaps, session recordings, surveys, and conversion funnel analytics aimed at helping businesses improve their online presence and customer satisfaction. The website is built using modern web technologies including Framer CMS and integrates multiple third-party analytics and advertising platforms such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Bing Ads. The technical infrastructure appears modern and moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enabled and use of Google Tag Manager for script management; however, the absence of security headers and explicit privacy and cookie policies indicates room for improvement. The lack of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, which should be verified to ensure trustworthiness. Overall, the website is professional and business-focused but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and clearer contact and security information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching luckyorange.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention luckyorange.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
7,506
Employees
0
Customers
7,506
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
11%

12 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for luckyorange.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Lucky Orange operates in the technology sector, specifically in SaaS for website analytics and optimization. Its business model revolves around subscription-based services targeting businesses seeking to improve website performance and customer engagement. The company leverages a multi-channel advertising approach including Reddit, Facebook, and Bing Ads, and integrates extensive tracking and analytics tools. While the website content is professional and consistent, the absence of publicly available WHOIS data and contact information may impact perceived credibility. The company appears to be a medium-sized entity with a focus on digital marketing and analytics solutions. Strategic partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data provided.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses reputable third-party analytics and advertising scripts, which is positive for security and data collection. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no evidence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program, which are important for compliance and trust. The extensive use of tracking scripts suggests a high level of user data collection, but without clear privacy and cookie policies, this raises compliance concerns especially under GDPR. The missing WHOIS data is a potential red flag for domain legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Provide clear and accessible contact information including support and incident response contacts.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS registration information to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Lucky Orange's website optimization tools like heatmaps and session recordings help you grow your business and keep customers happy.
Key services
heatmaps, session recordings, surveys, conversion funnel tools
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Bing Ads, Reddit Ads, Lucky Orange tracking script, Dwin1 tracking script, Framer (CMS/website builder)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for script management

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Lucky Orange
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Reddit Ads, Facebook Ads, Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Lucky Orange tracking
Marketing tools
Lucky Orange analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual for a commercial domain.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  4. Multiple third-party tracking and advertising scripts are used.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  6. Website uses modern fonts and is built with Framer CMS.
  7. SSL is enabled and scripts load over HTTPS.
  8. No security headers detected in the provided data; recommend adding.
  9. No security or incident response policies found on the site.
  10. Content is business-focused and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Framer platform and uses a modern tech stack including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and other advertising/tracking scripts. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts with extensive unicode coverage. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. However, the lack of detected security headers and absence of explicit privacy and cookie management features indicate technical debt in security and compliance areas. Hosting provider details are not evident from the data. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for marketing and analytics purposes but requires enhancements in security and privacy controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 74/100 +1Medium27 findingsView report
  2. 73/100Medium28 findingsView report
  3. 73/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with luckyorange.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review luckyorange.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.