Skip to main content

Security report for lpi.org

Linux Professional Institute (LPI) · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Linux Professional Institute (LPI) is a well-established non-profit organization specializing in global Linux and open source certification and career support. It holds a strong market position as the world's first and largest vendor-neutral Linux certification body, serving over 350,000 certified professionals across more than 180 countries. The organization offers a comprehensive portfolio of certifications, training partnerships, and community engagement programs, targeting IT professionals, educators, and organizations worldwide. Technically, the website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with a robust tech stack including Bootstrap, Elementor, and various performance and analytics tools such as Matomo and Google Tag Manager. The site demonstrates excellent mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, providing a fast and user-friendly experience. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, employs cookie consent mechanisms, and integrates CAPTCHA for form protection. While explicit security headers are not fully confirmed, no critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of WHOIS data due to privacy protection is justified given the organization's non-profit status and global presence. Overall, the website reflects a high level of professionalism, trustworthiness, and compliance with privacy regulations, making it a reliable resource for Linux certification and open source community support.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lpi.org

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
95
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LPI operates in the technology and education sectors as a non-profit entity focused on Linux and open source certification. Its competitive advantage lies in its vendor-neutral approach, extensive global reach, and comprehensive certification offerings. Revenue streams likely include exam fees, training partnerships, and sponsorships. The target customer segments include IT professionals, students, educators, and organizations seeking certified Linux talent. Growth indicators include a large certification holder base and active community programs. The partnership ecosystem includes major technology companies and educational institutions, enhancing credibility and reach.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforcement, use of CAPTCHA, and cookie consent management. No critical security policies or incident response contacts are published, representing an area for improvement. The lack of visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policies suggests limited formalized security communication. Overall, the site maintains good security hygiene but could enhance transparency and readiness by publishing explicit security policies and incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Introduce a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet or exceed compliance standards and improve user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Linux Professional Institute (LPI)
Description
Linux Professional Institute (LPI) is the global certification standard and career support organization for open source professionals. With more than 350,000 certification holders, it’s the world’s first and largest vendor-neutral Linux and open source certification body. LPI has certified professionals in over 180 countries, delivers exams in multiple languages, and has hundreds of training partners.
Key services
Linux and open source certifications, Exam delivery and preparation materials, Training partner programs, Community programs and membership, Digital badges and online testing
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Bootstrap, Slick Carousel, FontAwesome 6.4.0, Gravity Forms, Matomo Analytics, Borlabs Cookie Consent, SitePress Multilingual CMS (WPML), WP Rocket, Elementor
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of CAPTCHA (Google reCAPTCHA)
  • Cookie consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Borlabs Cookie, ShareThis
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is comprehensive, well-structured, and professionally presented
  3. Strong focus on Linux and open source certification and community support
  4. Multiple language support and international reach
  5. Use of modern web technologies and good SEO practices
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are clearly presented with consent mechanisms
  7. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security vulnerabilities detected
  8. WHOIS data unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, but no red flags in content
  9. Active social media presence and partner ecosystem
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern and widely supported technology stack centered on WordPress with Bootstrap and Elementor for responsive design. Performance optimizations include lazy loading, preconnects, and caching via WP Rocket. Analytics and marketing tools are integrated with user consent mechanisms, balancing data collection and privacy compliance. The technical infrastructure supports a fast, accessible, and SEO-optimized user experience. Opportunities exist to further harden security headers and streamline third-party dependencies to reduce technical debt.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lpi.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lpi.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.