Skip to main content

Security report for lowfruits.io

Semper Plugins, LLC · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LowFruits is a SaaS company operating a specialized keyword research and SERP analysis platform designed to help SEO professionals and businesses identify low-competition keywords and analyze search engine results pages more accurately. The company positions itself as a niche player offering advanced features like bulk SERP analysis, keyword clustering, and domain authority insights, targeting digital marketers and website owners seeking to improve organic search rankings. The business is relatively young, founded in 2020, and operates under Semper Plugins, LLC, a US-based entity. The website demonstrates a high level of professionalism with excellent content quality, clear navigation, and strong SEO optimization.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lowfruits.io

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention lowfruits.io, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
518
Employees
0
Customers
518
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
8%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for lowfruits.io.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company leverages a subscription and pay-as-you-go business model, providing scalable access to its tools. It maintains partnerships with related SEO brands such as AIOSEO and SEOBoost, enhancing its ecosystem. The platform integrates advanced keyword research features sourced directly from Google autocomplete and offers unique SERP weakness analysis to differentiate from competitors like Ahrefs and SEMRush. The target market includes SEO professionals, agencies, and businesses focused on organic growth. The presence of testimonials and structured data enhances trust and credibility. The company uses privacy protection for domain registration, which is justified given its business type.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and employs security best practices including security headers and clientDeleteProhibited domain status. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the site lacks a publicly available security policy or incident response contact information, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. The use of security plugins and monitoring scripts indicates a proactive approach to security. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a minor gap in DNS security. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from formalized policies and disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Consider adding direct company contact emails or phone numbers for support and security inquiries.
  5. Maintain regular security audits and update third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Semper Plugins, LLC
Description
Uncover hidden keyword gems & find easy-to-rank keywords with LowFruits, the best keyword research & SERP analysis tool for growing your business.
Key services
Bulk SERP analysis, Keyword clustering, Keyword difficulty analysis, Keyword finder, Domain explorer, Keyword rank tracker, Sitemap extractor
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, Google Analytics, MonsterInsights, Cloudflare DNS, Lindris API
Frameworks
WordPress Gutenberg blocks
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientDeleteProhibited domain status
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (am-site-security)
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, MonsterInsights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
MonsterInsights, Lindris
Marketing tools
MonsterInsights, Lindris API
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional SaaS SEO tool platform
  2. Content is rich and well structured with clear calls to action
  3. Strong SEO and accessibility practices observed
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found, only contact forms
  5. Use of privacy protection in WHOIS is common and justified
  6. No security policy or incident response info publicly available
  7. Good use of structured data and social media integration
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using modern Gutenberg blocks and integrates multiple JavaScript libraries and APIs such as MonsterInsights for analytics and Lindris for marketing. Hosting appears to leverage Cloudflare DNS services and GoDaddy as registrar. The site is well optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, with valid HTML and CSS. SEO is enhanced through comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph, Twitter cards, and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility features like skip links and screen reader text are implemented. The technical infrastructure supports a fast, reliable user experience with minimal technical debt observed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 71/100Medium29 findingsView report
  2. 71/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lowfruits.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lowfruits.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.