Skip to main content

Security report for loop11.com

Loop11 · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Loop11 is a technology company offering an easy-to-use online usability testing tool designed to help UX professionals, product managers, and designers make data-driven design decisions. The platform provides a comprehensive suite of usability testing and reporting features, positioning itself as a key player in the UX SaaS market. The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor, integrating advanced analytics and tracking tools such as Amplitude, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, and Google Tag Manager, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA, though there is room for improvement in implementing security headers and publishing clear privacy and security policies. The absence of WHOIS registrant data suggests privacy protection, which is common and justified for SaaS businesses. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized for its target audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching loop11.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention loop11.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,129
Employees
0
Customers
1,129
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
11%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for loop11.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Loop11 operates in the technology sector, specifically focusing on usability testing and UX analytics. Its SaaS business model targets UX professionals and organizations seeking to improve user experience through data-driven insights. The company leverages a robust ecosystem of marketing and analytics tools to optimize user engagement and conversion. While the domain WHOIS data is privacy protected, the website's content quality, branding consistency, and use of trust signals like SSL and analytics indicate a credible business. The lack of explicit contact information and privacy policies suggests an opportunity to enhance transparency and compliance. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data provided.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled and integration of Google reCAPTCHA v3 to mitigate automated abuse. Multiple analytics and tracking scripts are loaded asynchronously, reducing performance impact. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options were not detected in the provided content, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, nor a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file, which are best practices for mature security postures. The site does not expose sensitive data in the HTML, and no vulnerable libraries were identified. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with additional headers and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish clear and accessible privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details to improve privacy compliance and user trust.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Add explicit security policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate security maturity and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to minimize risk from vulnerable dependencies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Loop11
Description
Easiest Online Usability Testing Tool. Explore Loop11's full range of usability testing and reporting features. Streamline user testing, generate reports, and make data-driven design decision.
Key services
Usability testing, User testing, Reporting, UX analytics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.6.2, Elementor, Essential Addons for Elementor, Google Tag Manager, Amplitude Analytics, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, Google reCAPTCHA v3
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and analytics scripts asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Amplitude Analytics, Google Analytics (via GTM), Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Amplitude Analytics, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Amplitude, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or unregistered domain
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected in provided content
  4. Multiple modern analytics and tracking tools are used
  5. Website uses WordPress CMS with Elementor builder
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the analyzed content
  7. No security or incident response contact information found
  8. Website content is professional and focused on usability testing tools
  9. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.6.2 using the Elementor page builder and Essential Addons plugin, indicating a modern and flexible CMS infrastructure. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Amplitude, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, and Google Tag Manager, reflecting a data-driven approach to user engagement. The site uses asynchronous loading for scripts to optimize performance, and the design is responsive with good mobile optimization. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Accessibility features appear basic but present. Hosting provider details were not identified. Performance is moderate, with opportunities for further optimization. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with room for enhancements in accessibility and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with loop11.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review loop11.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.