Skip to main content

Security report for lona.is

Other · Sweden

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website lona.is represents a UI designer based in Stockholm, focusing on providing UI design services. The site serves primarily as a portfolio or personal branding platform, targeting individuals or businesses seeking UI design expertise. The business model is service-oriented with a small-scale operation. The website is built using modern web technologies such as React and Next.js and is hosted on Vercel, indicating a contemporary and performant technical infrastructure. The site loads quickly and is optimized for mobile devices, although accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, it lacks explicit security headers which could enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were detected. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no visible privacy or cookie policies, and no GDPR compliance indicators. Contact information and incident response channels are absent, limiting user trust and transparency. Overall, the website is professionally designed and technically sound but requires improvements in privacy compliance, security best practices, and transparency to enhance trustworthiness and regulatory adherence. The domain registration data aligns well with the website's claims, supporting legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include adding privacy and cookie policies, implementing security headers, publishing contact information for security incidents, and improving accessibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lona.is

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Lona operates as a small-scale UI design service provider based in Stockholm, Sweden. The business targets clients needing UI design, likely including startups, agencies, or individual entrepreneurs. The website acts as a portfolio and contact point, though explicit contact details are missing. The use of modern frameworks and hosting on Vercel suggests a focus on quality digital presence. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated. Revenue streams likely derive from design contracts. The absence of marketing or advertising tools suggests organic or direct client acquisition. The business maintains a consistent brand image but lacks trust signals such as certifications or testimonials.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could hinder timely reporting and resolution of security issues. Privacy compliance is weak, with no privacy or cookie policies, potentially exposing the business to regulatory risks under GDPR. The minimal use of analytics limits tracking risks but also reduces insights into user behavior. Overall, security maturity is moderate but can be significantly improved with standard best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information including an email for security incidents or abuse to improve incident response readiness.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
UI Designer based in Stockholm
Key services
UI design
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Vercel Analytics
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Platforms
Vercel
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Vercel Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Vercel Analytics
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a portfolio/personal site for a UI designer based in Stockholm.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly listed.
  4. No forms detected on the homepage HTML content.
  5. Uses modern web technologies (React, Next.js) and hosted on Vercel.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS is enabled.
  7. Minimal tracking via Vercel Analytics only.
  8. No advertising or affiliate programs detected.
  9. No social media links or contact information found in the HTML content.
  10. No structured data (JSON-LD) found in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including React and Next.js, hosted on Vercel, which provides fast performance and scalability. The HTML content is valid and includes proper meta tags for SEO and social sharing (Open Graph and Twitter cards). The site is mobile optimized with responsive design. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom or static site approach. Analytics usage is limited to Vercel Analytics, minimizing tracking footprint. No advertising or affiliate marketing technologies are present, simplifying the technical footprint. Overall, the technical implementation is modern and efficient but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lona.is. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lona.is.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.