Skip to main content

Security report for liveramp.de

LiveRamp · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LiveRamp is a global enterprise technology company specializing in data collaboration and identity resolution platforms that empower marketers and their partners to deliver personalized and privacy-compliant marketing experiences. The company holds a strong market position with a comprehensive suite of services including identity resolution, data activation, and marketing measurement, targeting enterprise clients such as media companies, retailers, and service providers. Their website is professionally designed, content-rich, and localized for multiple regions, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern SEO and privacy tools, but suffers from critical SSL/TLS misconfigurations that prevent secure HTTPS access, significantly impacting its security posture. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and consent mechanisms, aligning with GDPR standards. Overall, LiveRamp demonstrates strong business credibility and trustworthiness, though the lack of proper SSL implementation is a notable security risk that should be remediated promptly.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of liveramp.de. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching liveramp.de

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
87
Security headers
60
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LiveRamp operates in the technology sector, focusing on data-driven marketing solutions. Their business model revolves around providing a platform that connects disparate data sources to create unified customer views and enable data activation across channels. The company leverages a global partner ecosystem and serves a large enterprise customer base, as evidenced by their extensive partner logos and customer testimonials. Their multilingual websites and regional domains indicate a broad international reach. Revenue streams likely include platform subscriptions, data services, and consulting. The presence of investor relations and career pages suggests a well-established corporate structure with growth ambitions. Strategic partnerships and compliance with privacy regulations position LiveRamp competitively in the evolving data privacy landscape.

Security posture

The website's security posture is currently weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS support, exposing users to potential data interception risks. While HSTS is enabled, it is ineffective without proper TLS configuration. The site lacks modern TLS protocols, OCSP stapling, DNSSEC, and CAA records, which are standard best practices for securing web infrastructure. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which could hinder transparency and trust in security matters. However, no known vulnerabilities such as Heartbleed or POODLE are detected. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues and enhancement of DNS security measures are critical to improving the security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable and enforce modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and disable deprecated protocols.
  3. Implement OCSP stapling to improve certificate revocation checking performance and security.
  4. Configure DNSSEC and CAA records to protect DNS integrity and restrict certificate issuance.
  5. Publish clear security policies and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
LiveRamp
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO Premium plugin, jQuery, GSAP animation library, and Swiper slider, indicating a modern and interactive front-end. Hosting is inferred to be on Amazon AWS based on DNS nameservers. Performance is slow with a load time of approximately 16 seconds and a large page size (~820 KB) with over 200 resources, suggesting optimization opportunities. Mobile optimization and accessibility are rated good, with responsive design and accessibility features present. SEO is well implemented with comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. The site integrates Google Tag Manager and Ketch privacy manager for analytics and consent management. Technical debt includes missing SSL/TLS and DNS security features, which pose operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 63/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with liveramp.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review liveramp.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.