Skip to main content

Security report for literia.pl

E-commerce · Poland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LITERIA.pl is an established Polish online bookstore founded in 2008, offering a range of books, magazines, and subscription services. The website is built on the Magento CMS platform and integrates marketing tools such as Salesmanago for customer engagement and tracking. The business targets general consumers in Poland seeking online book retail services. Technically, the site employs standard web technologies including JavaScript and CSS, with moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Security posture is limited, with no advanced security headers or privacy policies detected, and DNSSEC is not enabled for the domain. The domain registration is consistent and long-standing, indicating legitimacy. However, the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies, as well as contact information, suggests areas for compliance and trust improvement.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching literia.pl

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the e-commerce sector focusing on retail book sales and magazine subscriptions. Its market position appears to be that of a niche online bookstore serving Polish customers. The business model is direct-to-consumer online retail. The integration of marketing tools like Salesmanago indicates an active approach to customer engagement and retargeting. The lack of visible certifications or trust badges may limit perceived credibility. The domain age and registrar information support a stable business presence. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data provided.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS but lacks DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options, which are recommended for enhanced security. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms were found. The use of third-party marketing scripts introduces moderate tracking but no obvious vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is basic and could benefit from improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  2. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security.
  3. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Publish clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and security culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Księgarnia online offering books, magazines, and subscriptions.
Key services
Online book sales, Magazine sales, Subscription services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Salesmanago
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Salesmanago
Marketing tools
Salesmanago
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an online bookstore targeting Polish customers.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage HTML.
  3. Uses Magento CMS platform with Mageplaza Blog extension.
  4. Includes Salesmanago marketing/tracking scripts.
  5. No visible contact emails or phone numbers in the provided HTML snippet.
  6. No security headers or advanced security policies detected in the HTML content.
  7. Domain is registered with a reputable registrar and has a long registration period.
  8. No WAF or blocking detected; content is accessible.
  9. No adult or NSFW content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Magento CMS with custom frontend assets and Mageplaza Blog extension. It uses JavaScript and CSS for UI and tracking scripts from Salesmanago for marketing automation. Hosting is provided by cyber_Folks S.A., a known hosting provider. The site shows moderate performance and basic mobile responsiveness. SEO metadata is present but limited to basic tags. Accessibility features are minimal. There is room for modernization and performance optimization, including improved mobile experience and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with literia.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review literia.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.