Skip to main content

Security report for liraland.com

LIRALAND Group · Technology · Ukraine

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LIRALAND Group is a medium-sized technology company based in Ukraine specializing in structural engineering software solutions. Their flagship products include LIRA-FEM for structural analysis and LIRA-CAD for architectural engineering, targeting professionals and students in civil and structural engineering. The company offers software licensing, training, and technical support services, positioning itself as a respected player in the international structural engineering software market. The website is professionally designed with good content quality, clear navigation, and mobile optimization, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the website is built on the Bitrix CMS platform, utilizing Bootstrap, jQuery, and various modern web technologies. It integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for user tracking and marketing insights. The site employs HTTPS with a strong SSL configuration and uses reCAPTCHA to protect forms, indicating a reasonable security posture. However, the absence of security headers and explicit privacy/cookie consent mechanisms suggests room for improvement in security best practices and GDPR compliance. From a security perspective, no critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The lack of WHOIS data for the domain is a concern, as it limits verification of domain legitimacy and ownership transparency. Despite this, the active social media presence, structured data, and consistent branding support the site's credibility. The company does not publicly disclose a security policy or incident response contacts, which could be enhanced to improve trust and compliance. Overall, the website and business demonstrate a solid foundation with good technical and business maturity. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and domain registration transparency would strengthen their security posture and trustworthiness, reducing potential risks and aligning with best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching liraland.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LIRALAND Group operates in the technology sector, focusing on structural engineering software for civil and architectural engineers. Their business model revolves around software sales, licensing, and providing training and technical support. The company targets engineering professionals and educational institutions, offering academic versions and training courses. Their market position is that of a respected international software provider with a medium-sized footprint. The company maintains multiple language versions of their website, indicating a global reach. They actively engage customers through social media and maintain a project gallery showcasing customer work, enhancing brand trust. The absence of WHOIS data is a minor concern but does not detract significantly from their operational transparency. The company appears stable, founded in 2002, with no parent or subsidiary companies explicitly identified.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with a strong SSL configuration and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect user inputs, demonstrating good baseline security practices. However, the absence of common security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No security or incident response policies are publicly disclosed, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The lack of explicit cookie consent mechanisms indicates potential GDPR compliance gaps. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, with room for improvement in headers, privacy compliance, and transparency around incident response.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add explicit cookie consent banners and privacy notices to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
LIRALAND Group
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LIRALAND Group
Description
Design, analyze, and collaborate more accurately with structural engineering tools. Most respected structural design and engineering software LIRA helps you
Key services
Structural analysis software (LIRA-FEM), Architectural engineering software (LIRA-CAD), RC structure analysis (MONOMAKH), Engineering assistance package (ESPRI), Training and technical support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 3.3.7, jQuery 2.1.3, Bitrix CMS, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA, Font Awesome, LazyLoad, Blueimp Gallery
Frameworks
Bitrix
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No WAF or security blocking detected
  3. WHOIS data unavailable, raising some concerns about domain registration transparency
  4. Good use of structured data and metadata for SEO and business info
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners found, potential GDPR compliance gap
  6. Multiple social media channels linked, indicating active engagement
  7. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (Bitrix)
  8. No visible security headers detected in HTML source
  9. No contact forms with visible fields in main HTML, but support ticket system linked
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy pages found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Bitrix CMS platform, leveraging Bootstrap 3.3.7 and jQuery 2.1.3, which are somewhat dated but still widely used. The site uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking and marketing purposes. Performance is moderate, with lazy loading implemented for images to improve load times. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph tags, and structured JSON-LD data. However, the use of older JavaScript libraries and lack of modern frameworks like React or Angular indicates some technical debt. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with liraland.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review liraland.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.