Skip to main content

Security report for liquid2.vc

Liquid 2 Ventures · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Liquid 2 Ventures is a venture capital firm focused on supporting exceptional founders through investment, experience, and community. Their website highlights a strong portfolio of over 30 unicorns and a combined enterprise value exceeding $100 billion, positioning them as a significant player in the technology investment space. The firm targets early-stage startups at pre-seed and seed stages as well as growth-stage companies starting at Series B. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear navigation and content relevant to founders and investors. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, jQuery, and Swiper.js, hosted on AWS Cloudfront CDN, ensuring fast performance and good accessibility. The site uses HTTPS with excellent SSL configuration, though no advanced security headers were detected. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. From a security perspective, the site maintains a good posture with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities. However, it lacks published privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, terms of service, and security or incident response policies, which are important for compliance and user trust. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures to improve compliance and user confidence. The domain WHOIS data is consistent with the business claims, showing transparency and legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching liquid2.vc

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
50
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Liquid 2 Ventures operates as a venture capital firm investing primarily in technology startups at early and growth stages. Their competitive advantage lies in a strong network, demonstrated by a portfolio of over 30 unicorn companies and $100B+ in combined enterprise value. The business model centers on providing capital, strategic guidance, and community access to founders. The target customers are startup founders seeking pre-seed to Series B funding. The firm emphasizes long-term partnerships and hands-on support, as evidenced by testimonials. The website reflects a mature digital presence with clear branding and professional content, supporting their market position as a trusted VC partner.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with enforced HTTPS and no exposed sensitive information. However, it lacks several best practices such as security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options), published security policies, and incident response contacts. There is no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file, which limits transparency for security researchers. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps, particularly regarding GDPR. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by adding formal policies, headers, and disclosure mechanisms to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add a terms of service page outlining user and business terms.
  3. Implement and publish a security policy and incident response contact information.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Liquid 2 Ventures
Description
Liquid 2 Ventures champions exceptional founders to build lasting companies through experience, community, and capital. They guide, support, and invest in the world's best founders starting at the pre-seed and seed stage, with a portfolio including 30+ unicorns and $100B+ in combined enterprise value.
Key services
Investment capital, Founder guidance and support, Community network access, Strategic introductions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, jQuery 3.5.1, Swiper.js, Finsweet ScrollDisable
Frameworks
Webflow CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Professional venture capital firm website with strong portfolio showcase
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap
  3. No visible contact phone numbers or physical addresses, only email contact
  4. Good use of modern web technologies and mobile optimization
  5. Testimonials and portfolio logos enhance trustworthiness
  6. No security policy or incident response information publicly available
  7. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond essential libraries
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS with modern JavaScript libraries like jQuery and Swiper.js for interactivity and animations. Hosting is via AWS Cloudfront CDN, contributing to fast load times and global availability. The site is fully responsive with excellent mobile optimization and good accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph images. There is no evidence of technical debt or deprecated technologies. The site uses custom scripts for dropdowns and portfolio rotation animations, indicating a well-maintained front-end. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern, performant, and well-implemented.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with liquid2.vc. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review liquid2.vc.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.