Skip to main content

Security report for linklist.bio

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Linklist.bio is a technology SaaS platform specializing in providing integrated link management solutions including link in bio, digital catalogs, link shortening, and QR code generation. The platform targets individuals and businesses seeking to consolidate their digital presence and product offerings in a single accessible location. The website demonstrates a professional market position with a consistent brand and good content quality, appealing to a broad audience interested in digital marketing and e-commerce facilitation. Technically, the website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks such as Vue.js and Vuetify, with backend indications of Laravel. It employs HTTPS with appropriate security headers and uses popular analytics and marketing tools like Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices, with good SEO practices and basic accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site shows good practices including HTTPS enforcement and security headers, but lacks explicit cookie consent mechanisms and detailed security or incident response policies. WHOIS data is unavailable due to TLD restrictions or privacy protection, which slightly reduces trust but is common for privacy-conscious tech companies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, Linklist.bio presents a low-risk profile with a solid security posture and professional business credibility. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and enhanced contact transparency would further strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching linklist.bio

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
60
Security headers
35
Email security
55
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention linklist.bio, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
9,731
Employees
0
Customers
9,731
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
15%

7 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for linklist.bio.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Linklist.bio operates in the competitive SaaS market for digital presence management, offering a unique combination of link in bio, digital catalog, and QR code services. Its business model is subscription-based SaaS targeting small to medium businesses and individual content creators. The platform leverages partnerships with major analytics and advertising providers to enhance marketing capabilities. Growth indicators include a well-structured website with multiple service endpoints and a multilingual approach. The company maintains a consistent brand and user experience, positioning itself as a reliable technology provider in the digital marketing space.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and multiple security headers implemented, reducing common web vulnerabilities. However, the absence of a cookie consent banner and explicit security policies indicates partial GDPR compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. The use of third-party tracking pixels introduces moderate user tracking, necessitating clear privacy disclosures. Overall, the security culture appears adequate but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced user privacy controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies including contact channels for reporting issues.
  3. Enhance website accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance with standards.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Provide clear and accessible contact information for customer support and security inquiries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Take your brand to the world with Linklist: your link in bio, digital catalog, link shortener and QR code generator.
Key services
link in bio management, digital catalog, link shortener, QR code generator
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Frameworks
Vuetify, Laravel (inferred from routes and API structure)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Facebook Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to TLD restrictions or privacy protection
  3. Website uses modern JavaScript frameworks and good security practices
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on landing page
  5. Privacy and terms of service pages are present and comprehensive
  6. No cookie consent mechanism detected, which may impact GDPR compliance
  7. Tracking pixels from Google and Facebook are present indicating marketing analytics
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
  9. Website content and design quality are good and professional
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring Vue.js and Vuetify for frontend UI, with backend routes suggesting Laravel PHP framework usage. It uses HTTPS with strong security headers, indicating good infrastructure security. Performance is moderate with preloading of critical assets and module preloading for JavaScript. SEO is well addressed with comprehensive meta tags and Open Graph data. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design. Technical risks are minimal but include the need for improved accessibility and privacy compliance mechanisms. The infrastructure appears scalable and maintainable with room for modernization in privacy and security transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with linklist.bio. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review linklist.bio.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.