Skip to main content

Security report for linguatime.com

Linguatime Ltd · Other · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Linguatime Ltd is a small UK-based business currently not accepting bookings, as stated on their website. The site provides minimal business information and lacks detailed descriptions of services or target audience. The website is built using GoDaddy Website Builder and hosted on GoDaddy infrastructure, employing modern web fonts and service workers for enhanced user experience. However, the content is basic and navigation is minimal, with no contact details or social media presence visible. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and a cookie consent banner, but lacks explicit security headers and detailed security or incident response policies. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no clear GDPR adherence. Overall, the website presents a low to moderate risk profile but would benefit from improved transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching linguatime.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business appears to be a small service provider, likely in language or translation services given the name, but no explicit services or market positioning are detailed. The domain age and privacy-protected WHOIS registration are consistent with a small UK business. The lack of contact information and social media presence limits visibility and trust. The business model seems to rely on direct bookings, currently suspended. There are no visible partnerships or certifications. The website's minimal content and basic design suggest limited digital maturity and marketing efforts.

Security posture

The website has a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options. There is no published security policy or incident response information, and no contact channels for security issues. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of secure forms or data collection mechanisms reduces attack surface but also limits user engagement. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, suitable for a small informational site but insufficient for handling sensitive data or transactions.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy with explicit GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add clear contact information including email and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  3. Introduce security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  4. Develop and publish terms of service and security policy pages to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Consider integrating social media links and business certifications to strengthen credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Linguatime Ltd
Description
Linguatime is currently closed and bookings are not being accepted until further notice.
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
GoDaddy Website Builder, JavaScript, Polyfill, Service Worker
Platforms
GoDaddy Hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Service Worker registered
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
GoDaddy tracking
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
GoDaddy tracking scripts
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is currently closed and not accepting bookings
  2. No contact information or forms available on the site
  3. Privacy policy page exists but is basic and not linked in main navigation
  4. Cookie consent banner is present and functional
  5. No terms of service or security policy pages found
  6. Site built and hosted on GoDaddy Website Builder platform
  7. No social media or external business contact links found
  8. No visible business certifications or trust seals
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the GoDaddy Website Builder platform, using modern web fonts and JavaScript polyfills for compatibility. Service workers are registered for offline capabilities or performance enhancements. The site loads multiple external scripts from wsimg.com and secureserver.net domains, indicating reliance on GoDaddy's hosting and tracking infrastructure. The site is mobile responsive with basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with no major errors or broken elements detected. SEO optimization is basic, with meta tags and Open Graph tags present but minimal content for indexing. Technical debt appears low due to the use of a managed platform, but customization and advanced features are limited.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with linguatime.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review linguatime.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.