Skip to main content

Security report for lindris.com

Lindris · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lindris is a technology company offering a SaaS email marketing platform positioned as a powerful yet affordable solution for businesses and marketers. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with a focus on inviting users to request access to their software. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress with common plugins for forms, analytics, and marketing, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS with GoDaddy as the registrar. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use, with basic SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and domain registration protections, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is partial with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Business credibility is supported by domain age, clear business description, and presence of terms and privacy pages, though no direct contact emails or phone numbers are provided. Overall, the website is functional and trustworthy but could improve in security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lindris.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Lindris operates in the competitive email marketing SaaS market, targeting small to medium businesses seeking cost-effective marketing tools. Their business model relies on software subscriptions, with a focus on inviting users to join via a request form. The company has maintained domain registration since 2016, indicating stability. The website integrates marketing and analytics tools such as OptinMonster and MonsterInsights, supporting lead generation and user engagement tracking. No direct partner or subsidiary domains were identified. The lack of direct contact information suggests a lean operation or early-stage business model. The company maintains standard legal pages but lacks advanced compliance or security disclosures.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses domain status locks to prevent unauthorized domain changes, indicating a baseline security awareness. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could expose the site to certain web attacks. Forms include validation but lack CAPTCHA or advanced bot protection. No published security policies, incident response plans, or vulnerability disclosure programs were found, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. Analytics tracking is extensive, which may raise privacy concerns without explicit cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner and explicit cookie policy to improve privacy compliance and user transparency.
  4. Introduce CAPTCHA or other anti-bot measures on forms to reduce spam and abuse.
  5. Publish a security policy, incident response plan, and vulnerability disclosure program to demonstrate security maturity and build trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lindris
Description
Powerful email marketing without the high costs
Key services
Email marketing software
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Easy Digital Downloads, SeedProd, WPForms, MonsterInsights, Stripe
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Form validation and spam protection (no reCAPTCHA enabled)
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP locks

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, MonsterInsights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
MonsterInsights
Marketing tools
OptinMonster, MonsterInsights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based SaaS marketing platform site
  2. Contains a functional contact form for invite requests
  3. Uses multiple marketing and analytics tools
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found
  5. Privacy policy and terms of service pages are present and linked
  6. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy detected
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  9. No data protection officer contact information found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using a modern plugin stack including SeedProd for coming soon pages, WPForms for form handling, Easy Digital Downloads for e-commerce capabilities, and MonsterInsights for analytics integration. The site loads external scripts from trusted domains such as Stripe for payments and Vimeo/YouTube for video tracking. Performance is moderate with some optimization for mobile devices. SEO is basic with meta tags and JSON-LD structured data present but no advanced optimization. Accessibility features are minimal but present. The technical infrastructure is standard for small SaaS businesses but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lindris.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lindris.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.