Skip to main content

Security report for lindholmeninnovationdistrict.se

Lindholmen Science Park AB · Technology · Sweden

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lindholmen Innovation District is a prominent innovation hub located in Gothenburg, Sweden, serving as a vibrant meeting place for innovation, culture, and experiences. The district caters to professionals, students, and companies, offering coworking spaces, event venues, and partnership opportunities. The website reflects a well-established community with active engagement through events and news updates. Technically, the site is built on Drupal 10, employs modern analytics tools like Matomo, and integrates cookie consent mechanisms ensuring GDPR compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security headers could be improved. Overall, the site presents a professional and trustworthy digital presence aligned with its business objectives.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lindholmeninnovationdistrict.se

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Email security
40
DNS health
45
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as an essential entity in the technology and real estate sectors, focusing on innovation district services including coworking, events, and community building. It targets a diverse audience from innovators to visitors and companies seeking to establish themselves in the district. The market position is strong within Gothenburg, with a growing user base and active partnerships. Revenue streams likely include space rentals, event hosting, and partnerships. The company maintains a consistent brand and leverages social media for outreach. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified from the data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent, and no exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure information. Security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not detected, representing an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or suspicious activities were found in the content or scripts. The site complies with GDPR through clear privacy and cookie policies, enhancing trustworthiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Provide a dedicated security policy page and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Consider adding verified company phone numbers and physical addresses to strengthen business credibility and user trust.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate potential vulnerabilities and ensure compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lindholmen Science Park AB
Description
Lindholmen Innovation District är Göteborgs mest kunskapsintensiva och expansiva område, samt en viktig knutpunkt för det växande Göteborg. Området erbjuder coworking, mötesplatser, event, restauranger och bostäder i en innovativ miljö.
Key services
Coworking spaces, Meeting venues, Event hosting, Partnership opportunities, Food and beverage services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, Matomo Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. WHOIS data for the subdomain is not available, which is expected.
  4. Strong privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms implemented.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  6. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly listed on the site.
  7. Contact primarily via email and web forms.
  8. Active event and news sections indicate ongoing community engagement.
  9. Use of modern analytics and tag management tools.
  10. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10 CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools such as Matomo and Google Tag Manager. It uses Cookiebot for cookie consent management, ensuring GDPR compliance. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility features and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with video content and images optimized for web delivery. No hosting provider details were identified from the content. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting a professional user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lindholmeninnovationdistrict.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lindholmeninnovationdistrict.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.