Skip to main content

Security report for limitless.ai

Limitless AI · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Limitless AI is a technology company specializing in wearable AI devices, specifically a pendant that captures and preserves conversations and personal insights. Their product integrates personalized AI powered by user data such as what they have seen, said, and heard. The company positions itself as an innovator in wearable AI with a strong emphasis on privacy, demonstrated by HIPAA-compliant medical grade data protection. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and uses modern web technologies including Next.js and React. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, TikTok Pixel, and Fathom Analytics, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security headers and incident response contacts are not publicly disclosed. The WHOIS data is privacy protected or unavailable, which is justified given the privacy focus of the business. Overall, the website and business present a trustworthy and professional image with room for improvement in privacy compliance transparency and security policy disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching limitless.ai

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
60
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention limitless.ai, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
3
Employees
0
Customers
3
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for limitless.ai.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Limitless AI operates in the wearable technology sector with a unique product offering that combines hardware and AI software services. Their business model includes selling a pendant device bundled with an unlimited AI subscription plan, targeting consumers interested in personal productivity and privacy. The company leverages partnerships with Stripe for payment processing and uses advanced analytics and marketing tools to optimize user engagement. The market positioning is innovative and privacy-centric, appealing to a niche audience valuing data security. The presence of testimonials and HIPAA compliance claims enhance trust. However, the lack of publicly available WHOIS and detailed contact information may limit some user confidence. The company appears small but technologically advanced, focusing on quality and user experience.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data in the HTML content. The company claims HIPAA-compliant data protection, which is a significant trust indicator for handling sensitive personal data. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security hardening. There is no public incident response or security contact information, which is a gap in transparency and readiness. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts introduces a moderate tracking footprint, which should be balanced with privacy compliance measures. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by adding security headers, cookie consent mechanisms, and incident response disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a clear cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries or tracking overreach.
  5. Consider publishing WHOIS data or providing verified business registration information to improve domain trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Limitless AI
Description
Go beyond your mind’s limitations: Personalized AI powered by what you’ve seen, said, and heard. The company offers a wearable AI pendant device that preserves conversations and allows users to interact with personalized AI. It emphasizes privacy with HIPAA-compliant medical grade protection.
Key services
Wearable AI pendant device, Personalized AI interaction, Conversation preservation and retrieval, HIPAA-compliant data privacy
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Google Tag Manager, Fathom Analytics, TikTok Pixel, Optimizely
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • HIPAA-compliant privacy claims
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Fathom Analytics, Segment Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
TikTok Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Segment Analytics, Fathom Analytics, Optimizely
Marketing tools
Optimizely, Segment
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Strong focus on privacy and HIPAA compliance
  3. Modern tech stack and good SEO practices
  4. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities
  5. Limited public contact information
  6. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected
  7. WHOIS data is privacy protected or unavailable
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies, primarily Next.js and React, ensuring good performance and SEO optimization. It is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. The integration of multiple analytics platforms (Fathom, Segment, Microsoft Clarity, TikTok Pixel) and marketing tools (Optimizely, Google Tag Manager) indicates a sophisticated digital infrastructure. The site uses secure payment processing via Stripe. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless approach. Performance is fast with preloading of key assets and fonts. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing security monitoring. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust and well-implemented.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with limitless.ai. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review limitless.ai.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.