Skip to main content

Security report for liketoknow.it

rewardStyle Inc. · E-commerce · N/a

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LTK operates as a large-scale e-commerce platform specializing in fashion, home, beauty, and fitness products curated by influencers. The platform targets consumers seeking trusted influencer recommendations and offers a seamless shopping experience via web and mobile apps. The company maintains a strong market position with over 40 million users and extensive social media presence. Technically, the website leverages modern JavaScript frameworks such as Vue.js and Nuxt.js, with Vuetify for UI components, and integrates video streaming via Mux. The site is mobile-optimized and includes consent management for privacy compliance. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, though security headers are not explicitly detected. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises some legitimacy concerns, but the professional site and corporate presence mitigate this risk. Overall, LTK presents a mature digital infrastructure with room for security enhancements and improved transparency in incident response.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching liketoknow.it

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
45
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LTK's business model centers on influencer-driven e-commerce, connecting consumers with products styled and recommended by trusted creators. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its vast influencer network and integration of multimedia content to enhance shopping engagement. Revenue streams likely include affiliate commissions and brand partnerships. The target customer segment is fashion and lifestyle consumers who value curated recommendations. The company demonstrates growth through app availability and extensive social media marketing. Strategic partnerships are evident with corporate domains and app store platforms. Operationally, LTK maintains comprehensive legal and privacy documentation, supporting compliance and trust. The lack of direct phone or physical address contact information suggests a primarily digital-first customer engagement approach.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforced and no visible leakage of sensitive information in the HTML content. Use of consent management scripts indicates attention to privacy compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options is a gap that could be exploited. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which limits transparency. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern, potentially indicating privacy protection or registration issues. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good, with recommendations to enhance header configurations and publish incident response contacts to improve resilience and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies with dedicated contact channels.
  3. Enhance contact information availability by including phone numbers or physical addresses to improve business credibility.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking services to minimize security risks and ensure privacy compliance.
  5. Investigate and resolve WHOIS data availability issues to improve domain legitimacy and trust signals.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
rewardStyle Inc.
Description
Shop thousands of products tried and styled by real people. Shop products across fashion, beauty, home, fitness and more. Tried and styled by real people for real life.
Key services
Product discovery, Influencer content aggregation, Shopping via app and website
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, Nuxt.js, Vuetify, Mux (video streaming), Google Tag Manager, FullStory, Branch.io
Frameworks
Vue.js, Nuxt.js, Vuetify
Platforms
Web, iOS app, Android app
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of consent management scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
FullStory, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
FullStory, Branch.io
Marketing tools
Branch.io, FullStory
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.
  2. No WAF or security challenge detected.
  3. WHOIS data is missing or domain is unregistered, which is unusual.
  4. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent management.
  5. Multiple social media and app store links indicate active marketing.
  6. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security vulnerabilities found in HTML.
  7. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and video streaming services.
  8. No contact phone numbers or physical addresses found; only email contact.
  9. No explicit security incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern JavaScript stack with Vue.js and Nuxt.js frameworks, utilizing Vuetify for UI components. Video content is delivered via Mux streaming services, enhancing user engagement. The site integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools including FullStory, Google Tag Manager, and Branch.io for tracking and user experience optimization. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and SEO optimization. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless architecture. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a scalable and engaging e-commerce experience but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with liketoknow.it. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review liketoknow.it.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.