Skip to main content

Security report for liinks.co

Liinks · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Liinks is a technology company providing a SaaS platform that centralizes online presence by aggregating social media, music, videos, and other content into a customizable link-in-bio page. The company targets content creators, professionals, entrepreneurs, and artists, positioning itself as a user-friendly and visually appealing solution with over 10,000 users and positive customer testimonials. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including React, AWS CloudFront CDN, and integrates multiple analytics and tracking services such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel, and Twitter Pixel. The site is mobile-optimized, fast-loading, and well-structured with good SEO practices. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses standard tracking scripts but lacks visible security headers and formal security policies or incident response contacts. Privacy compliance is limited due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies and no consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures to improve compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching liinks.co

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
68
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Liinks operates in the technology sector as a SaaS provider focused on digital marketing and social media management tools. Its business model revolves around offering customizable link-in-bio pages to a broad audience of creators and professionals, generating revenue likely through subscription plans and payment processing via Stripe. The company demonstrates a strong market position with a growing user base and positive feedback, indicating competitive advantages in ease of use and design quality. The ecosystem includes integrations with major social platforms and analytics providers, supporting data-driven marketing efforts. Strategic observations suggest opportunities for growth by enhancing compliance transparency and expanding security measures to meet evolving regulatory requirements.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data detected in the HTML content. However, it lacks explicit security headers and formal security policies, which are important for defense-in-depth. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file and incident response contact information indicates gaps in security governance and incident readiness. The extensive use of third-party tracking pixels increases the attack surface and privacy risks if not properly managed. Compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations is partial due to missing privacy and cookie policies and lack of consent mechanisms. Overall, while basic security practices are in place, there is room for improvement in formalizing security policies and enhancing user privacy protections.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and ensure it is easily accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  2. Implement a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Add terms of service and security policy pages to clarify user rights and security commitments.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses to improve transparency and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Liinks
Description
Gather your socials, music, videos, and more on a beautiful link-in-bio page.
Key services
Link-in-bio page creation, Social media aggregation, Customizable blocks, Portfolio presentation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, CloudFront CDN, Stripe (payment), Amplitude (analytics), Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel, Twitter Universal Website Tag
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of modern analytics and tracking scripts
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Amplitude, Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel, Twitter Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Twitter Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel, Twitter Pixel, Amplitude
Marketing tools
Helpscout Beacon
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional SaaS platform for link-in-bio services.
  2. Content is rich with customer testimonials and clear business focus.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy pages found, indicating compliance gaps.
  4. Extensive use of third-party analytics and tracking pixels.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  6. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly provided.
  7. Strong branding and consistent design observed.
  8. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies, primarily React, and is hosted on Amazon CloudFront CDN, ensuring fast content delivery and scalability. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Amplitude, Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel, and Twitter Pixel, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and Twitter card tags. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless architecture. Performance is fast with deferred script loading and CDN usage. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities and privacy compliance. The absence of security headers and formal security documentation represents technical debt that should be addressed to enhance security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with liinks.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review liinks.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.