Skip to main content

Security report for lfprojects.org

LF Projects, LLC · Other · United States

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in GDPR outside view.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LF Projects, LLC operates as a Delaware series limited liability company, establishing separate projects as series under the main entity. The website serves as a corporate presence, providing basic information about the company structure and projects. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress with common plugins such as Yoast SEO and Google Tag Manager, supported by DNSimple DNS services and monitored via New Relic. The website is accessible without any WAF or security challenges, indicating good availability. However, the site lacks explicit privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are missing, representing areas for improvement. Overall, the site is professional but could enhance compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lfprojects.org

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
90
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LF Projects, LLC targets a niche market as a series LLC, which is a specialized business model allowing multiple projects under one legal entity. The company appears small and focused, with no explicit contact or service details on the homepage, suggesting a controlled or invitation-only business approach. The lack of detailed service descriptions or client-facing content limits insights into revenue streams or customer segments. The use of standard web technologies and analytics tools indicates a moderate level of digital maturity. No partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly linked. The company maintains consistent branding and domain registration aligned with its business claims, supporting credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is properly configured, and the domain status includes clientTransferProhibited, preventing unauthorized transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose DNS spoofing risks. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency for security issues. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps, particularly regarding GDPR. The use of New Relic and Google Tag Manager suggests monitoring and analytics capabilities but also introduces tracking considerations. Overall, the site is secure enough for general business use but should enhance security controls and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing attacks.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security incident reporting.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security communication.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LF Projects, LLC
Description
LF Projects, LLC is a Delaware series limited liability company. Projects of LF Projects are established as separate ‘series’ of LF Projects.
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, New Relic Browser Agent, Events Calendar Pro, DNSimple DNS, Font Awesome
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
New Relic Browser, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
New Relic
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based business site for LF Projects, LLC
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on homepage
  4. Uses Google Tag Manager and New Relic for analytics and monitoring
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  6. Domain is registered with 1API GmbH and DNS hosted on DNSimple
  7. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity
  8. No WAF or security challenge detected
  9. Content is business-focused and safe for general audiences
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress, leveraging popular plugins like Yoast SEO and Events Calendar Pro, indicating a standard CMS-based infrastructure. DNS is managed by DNSimple, and the domain registrar is 1API GmbH. The site uses Google Tag Manager and New Relic Browser for analytics and performance monitoring. The HTML content is well-structured with proper meta tags and JSON-LD structured data for SEO. Performance appears moderate with no major blocking scripts detected. Mobile optimization is good, and accessibility is basic but present. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers suggests some technical debt in security hardening. Overall, the technical stack is modern and maintainable but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100Low26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lfprojects.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lfprojects.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.