Skip to main content

Security report for lemarit.de

LEMARIT GmbH · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LEMARIT GmbH operates a professional website focused on digital brand protection services, specializing in mitigating trademark infringements and securing brand control for corporate clients. The company positions itself as a niche specialist in the technology sector, targeting brand owners and businesses requiring comprehensive digital brand security solutions. The website demonstrates a good level of digital maturity, leveraging WordPress CMS with modern plugins such as Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA, and marketing automation via Mautic. The presence of GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies indicates a strong commitment to privacy compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and anti-bot measures implemented, though some security headers are not explicitly detected. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises questions about domain registration legitimacy, which should be further verified. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-structured, supporting the company's business objectives effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lemarit.de

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
77
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
85
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention lemarit.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for lemarit.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LEMARIT GmbH operates in the technology sector with a focus on digital brand protection, serving a B2B clientele. The business model revolves around providing specialized services to protect trademarks and brand assets in the digital space. The company maintains a consistent brand image and leverages social media channels for outreach. Marketing automation and analytics tools are integrated to optimize customer engagement and data-driven decision-making. The lack of visible physical address or phone contact suggests a lean operational model or a focus on digital communication channels. The company appears to have a stable market position within its niche, with no evident parent or subsidiary companies. The website content and technical infrastructure support a medium-sized enterprise profile.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from automated abuse, indicating a baseline security posture. Cookie consent is managed via a dedicated plugin ensuring GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options suggests room for improvement in hardening the web application against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of publicly available security policies or incident response procedures limits transparency and preparedness perception. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by implementing additional HTTP security headers and publishing security governance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and stakeholder confidence.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and reduce trust concerns.
  4. Expand contact information to include phone numbers and physical address to improve business credibility and customer trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update all third-party plugins and technologies to mitigate risks from vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LEMARIT GmbH
Description
Digitaler Markenschutz aus einer Hand: LEMARIT dämmt Markenrechtsverletzungen aktiv ein und sichert die volle Kontrolle Ihrer Marken.
Key services
digital brand protection, markenrechtsverletzungen (trademark infringement) mitigation, full control of brand assets
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Mautic marketing automation, Outfunnel Web Tracking, Real Cookie Banner plugin, Bootstrap 3.3.7, Owl Carousel, jQuery 3.7.1
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA implemented on forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism with GDPR compliance
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Outfunnel Web Tracking
Marketing tools
Mautic marketing automation
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Professional business website focused on digital brand protection
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance
  4. Use of modern marketing and analytics tools
  5. WHOIS data missing or unavailable, raising some legitimacy questions
  6. No security policy or incident response info publicly found
  7. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt present
  8. Contact info limited to email and contact form; no phone or physical address found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for client-side scripting, and several plugins for SEO, marketing automation, and cookie management. Performance is moderate with preconnect hints and resource preloading implemented. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO practices are supported by Yoast SEO and structured data in JSON-LD format. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security header implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lemarit.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lemarit.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.