Skip to main content

Security report for lemakoo.com

Michael Wright / LeMakoo · Other · Malta

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

lemakoo.com is a professionally presented artist portfolio website for Michael Wright, known as LeMakoo, specializing in oil paintings with a focus on Maltese and Australian themes. The site effectively showcases the artist's biography, galleries, commissions, and testimonials, targeting art collectors and enthusiasts. Hosted on WordPress.com with modern Gutenberg blocks and Jetpack plugins, the technical infrastructure is solid, offering good mobile optimization and SEO. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and nonce-protected forms, though lacking explicit security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is basic, with no cookie consent mechanism or detailed privacy policy. Overall, the site is trustworthy and functional but could improve in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lemakoo.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions Michael Wright as a niche artist with international and local recognition, leveraging exhibitions and private commissions as revenue streams. The business model is direct artist-to-customer sales and commissions, supported by a strong brand identity and testimonials. The target audience includes art collectors and Maltese-Australian communities. The site benefits from WordPress.com's hosting and ecosystem but lacks direct contact emails or phone numbers, relying on contact forms. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The content quality and branding are consistent, supporting a credible market presence.

Security posture

Security maturity is moderate to good, with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling. However, the absence of security headers like CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which limits transparency and preparedness. Privacy compliance is partial, lacking cookie consent and GDPR-specific disclosures. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the site is secure for its purpose but would benefit from enhanced security policies and headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  5. Enhance contact information with verified company emails or phone numbers for better business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Michael Wright / LeMakoo
Description
Website showcases oil paintings by artist Michael Wright, also known as LeMakoo, focusing on Maltese and Australian landscapes and art. The site includes artist biography, exhibitions, commissions, and galleries.
Key services
Art commissions, Art sales, Exhibitions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress.com hosting, Gutenberg blocks, Jetpack plugin, CoBlocks plugin, JavaScript ES6 modules
Frameworks
WordPress, Gutenberg
Platforms
WordPress.com
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of nonce tokens in forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
WordPress.com Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
WordPress.com Stats
Marketing tools
Jetpack Subscriptions
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress.com hosted artist portfolio
  2. Content is rich with artist biography, galleries, and testimonials
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners found
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers visible; contact via form only
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  6. Use of modern WordPress block editor and Jetpack features
  7. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress.com hosting with Gutenberg block editor and Jetpack plugins, ensuring a modern and maintainable tech stack. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with meta tags and Open Graph data. The site uses JavaScript modules and asynchronous loading for efficiency. There is no evidence of technical debt or outdated libraries. Hosting on WordPress.com provides robust infrastructure but limits some custom security configurations. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lemakoo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lemakoo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.