Skip to main content

Security report for leandata.com

LeanData, Inc · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LeanData, Inc is a technology company specializing in intelligent go-to-market orchestration solutions designed to improve buyer experience, accelerate revenue, and enhance operational alignment for B2B companies. The company positions itself as an established player in the GTM orchestration space, offering SaaS-based services that integrate with sales and marketing operations. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear messaging, and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, indicating a strong commitment to user experience and compliance. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including jQuery, HubSpot, Clearbit, and Cookiebot for marketing, analytics, and consent management. SEO is well implemented with Yoast SEO and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search visibility. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security headers and publicly available security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The absence of WHOIS registrant data slightly reduces trust but is common for commercial entities using privacy protection. Overall, LeanData's website demonstrates a solid business and technical foundation with good privacy compliance and marketing sophistication. Recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and providing clearer direct contact information to improve trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching leandata.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LeanData operates in the technology sector, targeting B2B customers who require advanced sales and marketing operational alignment tools. Their SaaS business model focuses on GTM orchestration, which is a niche but growing market segment. The company leverages partnerships and integrations with platforms like HubSpot and Salesforce, indicating a strong ecosystem approach. The website's content and social media presence suggest a medium-sized enterprise with a professional brand image. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for software services. Growth indicators include active marketing and analytics tool usage and consistent content updates. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified from the data.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, reflecting awareness of privacy regulations like GDPR. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No security policy or incident response information is publicly available, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerabilities or sensitive data leaks were found in the HTML content. The use of multiple third-party scripts requires ongoing vigilance to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security maturity is adequate but could be improved with additional controls and disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Provide explicit company contact emails and phone numbers on the website to facilitate communication and trust.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LeanData, Inc
Description
LeanData helps companies improve the buyer experience, accelerate time-to-revenue and increase operational alignment.
Key services
Buyer experience improvement, Revenue acceleration, Operational alignment
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Clearbit, HubSpot, Cookiebot
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Tag Manager, CrazyEgg
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
HubSpot Ads
Tracking pixels
Clearbit, Facebook Pixel, Cookiebot, CrazyEgg
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Clearbit, Typeform
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, which is a minor trust concern.
  3. Strong privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms implemented.
  4. Use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML; contact primarily via forms and social media.
  6. Good SEO and structured data implementation.
  7. No security policy or incident response info publicly available.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern and well-maintained tech stack including jQuery and HubSpot integrations. SEO is optimized using Yoast SEO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format, improving search engine visibility. The site loads external resources from reputable domains such as Google Fonts, Clearbit, and Cookiebot, supporting marketing and analytics functions. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Hosting provider details were not identified from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively with room for performance and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100 +4Medium29 findingsView report
  2. 69/100Medium26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with leandata.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review leandata.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.