Skip to main content

Security report for leadsrx.com

LeadsRx · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LeadsRx is a technology company specializing in multi-touch marketing attribution and customer journey analytics. Founded in 2015, it offers B2B SaaS solutions that provide unbiased insights from marketing data to help businesses optimize their marketing efforts. The company positions itself as a specialized provider in the marketing attribution space with a professional and consistent brand presence. The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Salesforce CRM. Hosting is provided via AWS infrastructure, indicating a modern and scalable technical setup. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and some anti-fraud measures like ClickCease and reCAPTCHA, but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of leadsrx.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching leadsrx.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
25
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LeadsRx operates in the technology sector focusing on marketing analytics. Its business model is SaaS-based, targeting businesses that require detailed marketing attribution and customer journey analysis. The company leverages integrations with major platforms like Salesforce and uses advanced tracking and analytics tools to deliver its services. The market position is that of a niche specialist with a medium-sized business profile. The website content and structured data indicate a clear focus on marketing professionals and enterprises seeking data-driven marketing insights. Social media presence across major platforms supports brand visibility and engagement. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The company appears to maintain consistent branding and professional content quality.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and anti-fraud and bot mitigation tools such as ClickCease and Google reCAPTCHA are in use. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which is a compliance gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also indicates potential compliance risks with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident from the content.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  4. Add a security policy page and provide incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email).
  5. Conduct a privacy compliance audit and implement a cookie consent mechanism to improve user trust and legal compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LeadsRx
Description
LeadsRx provides multi-touch attribution and customer journey analytics solutions that offer unbiased insights from data.
Key services
Multi-touch attribution, Customer journey analytics, Marketing data insights
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Reddit Pixel, ClickCease, Drift Chat, Salesforce CRM integration, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Yoast SEO, Divi Builder
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of reCAPTCHA
  • ClickCease anti-fraud script

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Reddit Pixel
Marketing tools
Drift Chat, ClickCease
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress with Divi theme and multiple marketing and analytics integrations.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML content.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  4. Social media links present in JSON-LD structured data.
  5. Security best practices partially implemented; DNSSEC missing and no security headers detected.
  6. Website content is professional and business-oriented, targeting marketing professionals and businesses.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Divi theme, a widely used CMS and theme combination that supports rapid development and customization. The tech stack includes jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook and Reddit pixels, Salesforce CRM integration, and anti-fraud tools like ClickCease. Hosting is via AWS DNS servers, indicating cloud infrastructure usage. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. Some technical debt is indicated by missing DNSSEC and lack of security headers. The site uses asynchronous loading for many scripts, which helps performance. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could be improved with enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 67/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with leadsrx.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review leadsrx.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.