Skip to main content

Security report for leadinfo.net

Leadinfo · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Leadinfo is a B2B SaaS company specializing in identifying anonymous website visitors to help businesses grow their sales funnel and generate better leads. Their platform offers tools such as Leadbot for conversion optimization, contact management, and integrations with CRM and marketing systems. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and uses modern technologies including WordPress with Elementor, multiple analytics and tracking services, and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and security headers, though explicit security policies and incident response information are not published. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trust slightly but does not detract from the professional presentation and business legitimacy. Overall, Leadinfo presents a mature digital presence suitable for its target B2B audience.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of leadinfo.net. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching leadinfo.net

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
82
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Leadinfo operates in the technology sector, targeting B2B companies seeking to identify and convert website visitors into leads. Their business model is SaaS-based, focusing on lead generation and sales funnel enhancement. The company leverages partnerships and showcases customer testimonials to build trust. The website content and structure indicate a medium-sized enterprise with a consistent brand and strong market positioning in the lead identification niche. The use of multiple marketing and analytics tools suggests a data-driven approach to growth and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements key security headers, indicating a good security baseline. Cookie consent is managed via Iubenda, supporting GDPR compliance. However, there is no publicly available security policy or incident response plan, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file was found. The use of multiple third-party scripts introduces potential risk vectors that should be regularly audited. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with more transparency and dedicated security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Provide direct security contact emails such as security@ or abuse@ addresses.
  4. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and tracking services for security risks.
  5. Enhance transparency on data retention and privacy practices to strengthen GDPR compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Leadinfo
Description
Grow your sales funnel and generate better leads. Start identifying B2B website visitors and reach out to them within Leadinfo's all-in-one platform.
Key services
Lead identification, Leadbot for conversion optimization, Contact management, Integrations with CRM and marketing tools, Automated outreach
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Iubenda cookie solution, Amplitude analytics, Mouseflow, Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, Font Awesome, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Amplitude, Mouseflow, Microsoft Clarity, HubSpot
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Amplitude, Mouseflow, Microsoft Clarity, Reddit Pixel
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professionally presented and targeted at B2B lead generation.
  3. Strong use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and implemented with consent mechanisms.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact via form.
  6. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual but not uncommon for privacy-protected domains.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. Website uses multiple third-party tracking and analytics services.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Elementor page builder, with a modern tech stack including Amplitude, Mouseflow, Microsoft Clarity, and HubSpot for analytics and marketing automation. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and lazy loading of images. The presence of multiple external domains for analytics and tracking is noted, which supports extensive user behavior analysis but requires careful privacy management. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust and supports the business goals effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100 +3Medium27 findingsView report
  2. 70/100 +13Medium28 findingsView report
  3. 57/100Medium26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with leadinfo.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review leadinfo.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.