Skip to main content

Security report for leadinfo.net

Leadinfo · Technology · Netherlands

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Leadinfo is a technology company specializing in B2B lead generation by identifying companies visiting client websites. The platform offers a comprehensive suite of services including lead identification, contact discovery, multi-channel outreach, and seamless CRM integrations. With an international presence and a user base exceeding 15,000, Leadinfo positions itself as a leading player in the lead generation market. The website is professionally designed, content-rich, and optimized for SEO, targeting B2B businesses seeking to enhance their sales funnel and lead quality. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and integrates various modern web technologies and marketing tools such as HubSpot and Iubenda for cookie consent. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support is a critical security vulnerability that significantly impacts the site's security posture. Security headers are minimal, and no advanced security frameworks or incident response policies are publicly disclosed. Privacy compliance is strong, with clear GDPR adherence and cookie consent mechanisms in place. Overall, while the business and technical maturity are high, immediate remediation of the SSL/TLS issues is essential to ensure user trust and data protection.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of leadinfo.net. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching leadinfo.net

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Leadinfo operates a SaaS business model focused on providing B2B companies with actionable insights into their website visitors to generate better leads and increase sales conversions. The company leverages a large international database covering 195 countries and over 220 million companies, offering extensive data points to its clients. Its competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive dataset, multi-channel outreach capabilities, and native integrations with over 70 popular tools including Salesforce, HubSpot, and Microsoft Teams. The company maintains a strong partner ecosystem with over 2,000 certified partners worldwide, enhancing its market reach and service delivery. The website's content and testimonials indicate a medium-sized enterprise with a professional approach to customer engagement and compliance. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled communication channels via forms and portals.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is weak due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate and absence of HTTPS support, which is a critical vulnerability exposing users to potential data interception and undermining trust. No modern TLS protocols are enabled, and essential security features such as HSTS, OCSP stapling, and session resumption are missing. Security headers are limited to basic server and CORS headers, with no advanced protections like Content Security Policy or X-Frame-Options detected. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response information, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present. While no known SSL vulnerabilities or subdomain takeover risks are identified, the fundamental lack of HTTPS significantly lowers the security score and poses a high risk to users and the business.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across all domains and subdomains.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and disable deprecated protocols.
  3. Configure HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  4. Enable OCSP stapling to improve certificate validation performance and security.
  5. Add comprehensive security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  6. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible from the website.
  7. Consider implementing a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure program.
  8. Enhance accessibility features and optimize performance metrics for faster load times.
  9. Provide direct company contact information including verified emails and phone numbers for transparency.
  10. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to reflect evolving compliance requirements.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Elementor page builder framework, leveraging jQuery and various JavaScript libraries including HubSpot tracking and Iubenda cookie consent scripts. It uses Google Fonts and DotLottie player for animations. Hosting is inferred to be on Amazon AWS based on DNS nameservers. The site is well-structured with comprehensive SEO meta tags and Open Graph data. However, performance metrics are missing, indicating potential issues with load times. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility is basic. The absence of HTTPS and modern security configurations is a significant technical risk. The site integrates with multiple CRM and marketing platforms, supporting a robust lead generation ecosystem. Technical debt is moderate, with opportunities for modernization in security and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium27 findingsView report
  2. 73/100 +3Medium27 findingsView report
  3. 70/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with leadinfo.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review leadinfo.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.