Skip to main content

Security report for leadinfo.com

Leadinfo · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Leadinfo is a technology company specializing in B2B lead generation and website visitor identification through a SaaS platform. Their services include identifying anonymous website visitors, lead outreach, and conversion automation, targeting businesses seeking to grow their sales funnel. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and Elementor, integrating modern analytics and marketing tools such as HubSpot, Mouseflow, and Microsoft Clarity. Privacy and cookie policies are well implemented with consent mechanisms, reflecting GDPR compliance. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities, though no explicit security policy or incident response information is provided. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and mature digital presence suitable for its business domain.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of leadinfo.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching leadinfo.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
82
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Leadinfo operates in the competitive B2B lead generation market, leveraging technology to uncover companies behind anonymous website visits. Their business model is SaaS-based, offering an all-in-one platform for lead identification and outreach. The company targets medium-sized businesses and agencies, supported by a partner ecosystem and customer testimonials. The website content and structure indicate a focus on user experience and conversion optimization. While WHOIS data is privacy protected, the domain and website maturity align with a legitimate commercial entity. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for contact forms and controlled communication channels.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with enforced HTTPS, multiple security headers, and cookie consent management. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of a public security policy, vulnerability disclosure program, or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. The use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts introduces a moderate tracking footprint, balanced by privacy compliance measures. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by publishing explicit security and incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts to minimize potential vulnerabilities and privacy risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance with standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Leadinfo
Description
Grow your sales funnel and generate better leads. Start identifying B2B website visitors and reach out to them within Leadinfo's all-in-one platform.
Key services
Lead identification, Leadbot for conversions, Contact outreach, Integrations with other platforms, Autopilot lead conversion
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Google Tag Manager, Mouseflow, Microsoft Clarity, Iubenda (cookie consent), Font Awesome, Google Fonts, jQuery
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Mouseflow, Microsoft Clarity, HubSpot
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Mouseflow, Microsoft Clarity, HubSpot, Reddit Pixel
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is professionally presented and targeted at B2B lead generation
  3. Strong privacy and cookie policy presence with consent mechanisms
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found, only contact forms
  5. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools
  6. No visible security or vulnerability disclosure pages
  7. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection
  8. Website uses WordPress CMS with Elementor builder
  9. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder, utilizing modern web technologies including jQuery, Font Awesome, and Google Fonts. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as HubSpot, Mouseflow, and Microsoft Clarity for user behavior tracking and conversion optimization. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good accessibility practices. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and lazy loading of images. The technical infrastructure is robust for a medium-sized SaaS business, though hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Opportunities exist to optimize performance further and enhance security transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 74/100Medium26 findingsView report
  2. 74/100 +11Medium26 findingsView report
  3. 63/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with leadinfo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review leadinfo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.