Skip to main content

Security report for later.com

Later · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Later is a well-established technology company specializing in influencer marketing and social media management solutions. Founded in 1997, it serves the creator economy by providing tools for influencer marketing, social listening, social media scheduling, and link in bio services. The company targets influencers, marketers, and social media managers, positioning itself as a key player in the social media marketing technology space. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear branding, and comprehensive content that supports its business model. Technically, Later employs a modern web stack including React and Gatsby, hosted on AWS infrastructure. The site integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Marketo, Google Tag Manager, TikTok Pixel, and Facebook Pixel, indicating a sophisticated approach to digital marketing and user tracking. Performance and mobile optimization are excellent, with good accessibility and SEO practices. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, uses security headers, and maintains domain registration protections. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is strong with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms in place. Overall, Later demonstrates a high level of professionalism, security maturity, and privacy compliance. The domain age and WHOIS data support its legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing a security policy and incident response page, and considering a vulnerability disclosure program to further enhance trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching later.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
60
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention later.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
98,822
Employees
1
Customers
98,756
Third parties
65
Weak passwords
11%

Latest record dated 2025-08-19 · 67 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for later.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –app.later.com2025-08-19

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Later operates in the technology sector focusing on social media marketing and influencer marketing SaaS solutions. Its business model revolves around subscription-based software services targeting creators and marketers. The company leverages partnerships with major social media platforms and integrates advanced analytics and marketing automation tools. Market positioning is strong with a clear focus on the creator economy, supported by extensive digital marketing efforts. The absence of a parent company or subsidiaries suggests independent operation. Growth indicators include active use of multiple tracking and marketing platforms and a comprehensive online presence.

Security posture

Later exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, clientTransferProhibited domain status, and use of security headers. The lack of DNSSEC is a minor gap. No security policy or incident response information is publicly available, which could be improved. The site uses extensive tracking pixels and marketing tools, which increases the attack surface but appears well-managed. No vulnerabilities or sensitive data exposures were found. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms align with GDPR requirements, indicating good compliance. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident, representing areas for enhancement.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to increase transparency
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking pixels to minimize security risks
  5. Enhance user privacy controls and provide clear data retention policies
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Later
Description
Later powers the creator economy with influencer marketing, social media management, social listening, and link in bio solutions & services to drive real ROI.
Key services
Influencer marketing, Social media management, Social listening, Link in bio solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Gatsby, AWS DNS, Marketo, Google Tag Manager, TikTok Pixel, Facebook Pixel, Pinterest SDK, Twitter UWT, Bing Ads
Frameworks
React, Gatsby
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • No DNSSEC (not enabled)
  • Use of security headers
  • Consent mechanism for cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), TikTok Analytics, Facebook Analytics, Pinterest Analytics, Twitter Analytics, Bing Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel, Pinterest SDK, Twitter UWT
Marketing tools
Marketo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Professional and modern design with responsive layout
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanism
  4. Use of multiple marketing and analytics tools indicating mature digital marketing
  5. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected
  6. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-term operation
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response page found
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React and Gatsby framework, leveraging AWS for hosting and DNS services. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics platforms including Marketo, Google Tag Manager, TikTok, Facebook, Pinterest, Twitter, and Bing. The site is optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, with good accessibility and SEO practices. The use of clientTransferProhibited status and HTTPS indicates sound domain and transport security. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended best practice. The technical infrastructure supports a scalable and secure platform but could benefit from enhanced DNS security and formalized security documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with later.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review later.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.