Skip to main content

Security report for landico.co.uk

The Landi Company Textile Conservation Ltd · Other · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Landi Company Textile Conservation Ltd is a specialized service provider focused on textile conservation, offering research, conservation, and presentation services for historic and contemporary textiles. The company targets individuals and institutions requiring expert textile restoration and preservation. The website reflects a niche market position with a professional and consistent brand presence. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Yoast SEO and Colibri Page Builder, supporting good SEO and user experience. HTTPS is properly configured, and cookie consent mechanisms are in place, indicating a baseline security posture. However, the absence of a privacy policy and WHOIS data gaps present compliance and trust concerns. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching landico.co.uk

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
59
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in a niche sector of textile conservation, serving a specialized clientele interested in heritage preservation. Its business model revolves around expert service delivery, education, and training. The website's testimonials and social media presence support credibility and market positioning. The lack of detailed business registration data and contact information online limits full assessment of operational scale and partnerships. The company appears to be a small-sized entity based in the UK, focusing on quality and specialized services rather than volume. Growth potential may be linked to expanding educational offerings and digital outreach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented. However, the absence of key security headers and lack of a published security policy or incident response contacts indicate areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The missing WHOIS data and domain registration irregularities raise concerns about domain legitimacy, which should be addressed to strengthen trust. Compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations is unclear due to missing privacy documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident reporting.
  4. Provide clear and verified contact information including company emails and phone numbers.
  5. Verify and correct domain registration details with the registrar to resolve WHOIS inconsistencies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
The Landi Company Textile Conservation Ltd
Description
The Landi Company offers a full range of textile conservation services including research, conservation and presentation of textiles to the highest standard
Key services
Textile conservation, Research, Presentation of textiles, Education and training
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 7.0.2, Yoast SEO plugin, Colibri Page Builder Pro, jQuery, Swiper.js, Fancybox, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Cookie Law Info plugin, Forminator plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to domain registration error indicating naming rules violation.
  3. Website uses WordPress CMS with modern plugins and SEO tools.
  4. HTTPS is enabled with no visible SSL issues.
  5. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented.
  6. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the site.
  7. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided content.
  8. Social media presence includes Instagram, Twitter (X), and LinkedIn.
  9. Content is focused on textile conservation services with professional tone and testimonials.
  10. No adult or explicit content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using up-to-date plugins and libraries such as Yoast SEO, Colibri Page Builder Pro, jQuery, Swiper.js, and Fancybox. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for analytics and tracking. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. Performance is moderate with no critical technical issues detected. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional online presence but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with landico.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review landico.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.