Skip to main content

Security report for labv.io

LabV · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LabV is a specialized Material Intelligence platform designed to streamline R&D processes by centralizing formulations, test data, and process information. The platform targets industrial R&D teams, offering features such as automated data import, AI-powered assistance, digital collaboration, and open API integrations. Positioned as a niche SaaS provider, LabV emphasizes accelerating development and improving decision-making through structured data management. Technically, the website is built on Webflow with modern web standards, integrating Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and consent management. The site is well-optimized for mobile and accessibility, with professional design and clear navigation. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and encrypted data transmission, though explicit security headers and detailed privacy policies are absent. Overall, the website projects a trustworthy and professional image, supported by customer testimonials and clear business focus. The lack of WHOIS data limits domain trust assessment, but the business credibility remains high based on site content and presentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching labv.io

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LabV operates in the technology and manufacturing sectors, focusing on R&D software solutions for material and product development. Its business model is B2B SaaS, targeting medium to large industrial companies requiring structured data management and AI-enhanced analytics. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its integration of formulations, test results, and process data into a unified system, reducing manual work and enabling faster innovation. The company leverages partnerships with leading industrial clients, as evidenced by testimonials, to build market credibility. Growth indicators include AI-powered features and open API connectivity, positioning LabV well for expanding into complex development environments. Strategic observations suggest a focus on user-friendly interfaces and modular integration to capture diverse R&D workflows.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS and encrypted data transmission. GDPR compliance is claimed, supported by a cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot. However, the absence of explicit privacy and terms of service pages, security headers (such as CSP, HSTS), and vulnerability disclosure policies indicates room for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Incident response and security contact information are not publicly available, which could hinder rapid response to security events. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good, suitable for a SaaS provider but requiring enhancements to meet higher compliance and trust standards.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the homepage.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents and establish a vulnerability disclosure policy.
  4. Enhance transparency by publishing data protection officer contact details and relevant certifications.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and integrations to ensure no vulnerable libraries are included.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LabV
Description
LabV is the Material Intelligence platform for R&D. It brings formulations, processes and test data together in one place. Structured, connected and ready to analyze. For faster development, better decisions and more innovative materials.
Key services
Centralized data management for formulations, tests, and processes, Automated data import from test equipment, AI-powered R&D assistance, Digital collaboration and project management, Open API for integration with ERP and other systems
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Webflow CMS, HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Frameworks
Webflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Encrypted data transmission mentioned
  • GDPR compliance claimed
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is rich, professional, and targeted at industrial R&D teams.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via Cookiebot.
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via form.
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable due to malformed response; domain registration details unknown.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools is evident.
  8. Strong branding and customer testimonial presence enhance trust.
  9. No security headers detected in provided data; recommend adding for improved security posture.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript technologies. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and cookie consent management. Hosting is via Webflow's CDN, ensuring moderate to good performance and global availability. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes accessibility features such as focus outlines and semantic HTML. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical risks are minimal, but the lack of security headers and incomplete privacy documentation represent potential compliance and security gaps. Opportunities exist to enhance performance further by optimizing media assets and implementing advanced caching strategies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with labv.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review labv.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.