Skip to main content

Security report for laburity.com

Laburity · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Laburity is a professional and holistic cybersecurity research lab and services provider established in 2022. The company offers tailored cybersecurity services including vulnerability assessments, penetration testing, dark web monitoring, secure code analysis, and managed SOC services. The website positions Laburity as a trusted partner recognized by major companies, aiming to safeguard the digital future of its clients. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress with Elementor, supported by Cloudflare DNS and integrated marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics and MonsterInsights. The website demonstrates good design quality, mobile optimization, and SEO practices, providing a positive user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, though improvements are recommended in DNSSEC deployment and security headers. Privacy compliance is limited due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, Laburity presents a credible and professional cybersecurity business with room for enhanced transparency and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching laburity.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
70
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Laburity operates in the technology sector, specifically cybersecurity services. Its business model focuses on providing specialized security assessments and monitoring services to businesses. The company targets organizations seeking proactive cybersecurity solutions. Market positioning is strengthened by recognition from major industry players, as evidenced by displayed logos. The website content and structure indicate a small-sized enterprise with a focus on quality and tailored services. The use of modern CMS and marketing tools suggests digital maturity. However, the lack of explicit contact emails and privacy policies may limit trust for some clients. No subsidiaries or parent companies are identified, indicating an independent operation. The partnership ecosystem includes scheduling via Calendly and analytics integrations. Growth indicators are not explicitly stated but the recent domain registration aligns with a startup or emerging business phase.

Security posture

Laburity's security posture is moderate to good. The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cloudflare DNS, providing baseline security. The domain status clientTransferProhibited prevents unauthorized domain transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended security enhancement. The website lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options, which could mitigate certain web attacks. No security policy or incident response contact information is published, limiting transparency in handling security incidents. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, which is a best practice for security communication. The presence of multiple tracking and marketing scripts increases the attack surface but is common in modern websites. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved with additional security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information, including abuse@ or security@ email addresses.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Laburity
Description
Professional And Holistic Cyber Security Research Lab and Services Provider focused on safeguarding the digital future. Offers tailored professional cyber security services according to business, infrastructure, and applications.
Key services
Vulnerability Assessments and Penetration Testing, Dark Web Monitoring, Secure Code Analysis, Managed Security Operations Center (SOC)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, PHP, JavaScript, Google Analytics, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, MonsterInsights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Leadfeeder, Brevo Conversations, Apollo, MonsterInsights
Marketing tools
MonsterInsights, Brevo Conversations, Apollo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional cybersecurity services provider with a clear business focus.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found on the homepage or visible content.
  3. Contact information is primarily via contact form; no explicit emails or phone numbers found in content.
  4. Use of modern WordPress CMS with Elementor builder and multiple marketing/analytics scripts.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response contact details published.
  7. Domain registration and DNS setup are consistent and secure but DNSSEC is not enabled.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Elementor page builder, indicating a modern and flexible content management approach. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits. The site uses multiple JavaScript libraries and marketing tools including Google Analytics, MonsterInsights, Leadfeeder, Brevo Conversations, and Apollo for tracking and user engagement. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features such as an accessibility toolbar. SEO metadata and structured data (JSON-LD) are well implemented, enhancing search engine visibility. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates technical debt in security hardening. The site does not expose sensitive data or credentials in the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but can benefit from security-focused modernization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with laburity.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review laburity.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.