Skip to main content

Security report for laa.law

Law in Austria · Other · Austria

Partial score · DNS & email only

50/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Law in Austria is a Vienna-based legal services provider specializing in multimedia, digital, and interdisciplinary legal advice. The firm positions itself as a client-oriented partner offering precise and timely legal solutions. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting clients seeking legal expertise in Austria. Technically, the site is built on the Webflow CMS platform, leveraging modern web fonts and JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Finsweet Cookie Consent for privacy compliance. Hosting appears to be via Cloudflare CDN, enhancing content delivery performance. However, a critical security gap exists due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS enforcement, exposing visitors to potential risks. The site implements a cookie consent banner with opt-in capabilities, aligning with GDPR requirements, but lacks explicit contact information and terms of service pages, which could affect user trust and compliance completeness. Overall, the website demonstrates moderate digital maturity but requires urgent security improvements to meet industry standards.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching laa.law

This scan found 4 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
50
DNS health
50
Network security
100
Average
50

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The firm operates in the legal services sector, focusing on the Austrian market with a small-sized business model. Its competitive advantage lies in its digital and interdisciplinary approach to legal advice, catering to clients who value precision and modern communication channels. The website highlights a team of legal professionals, indicating a personalized service model. While the site includes social media links and a newsletter subscription option, it lacks detailed business registration or certification disclosures. The absence of explicit contact details on the main page may limit direct client engagement. The partnership ecosystem includes web design and cookie consent providers, but no critical third-party business partners are identified. Growth indicators are not explicitly stated, and the firm appears to maintain a focused local presence.

Security posture

The security posture is currently weak due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled HTTPS protocols, which is a critical vulnerability. While some security headers like Content Security Policy and X-Frame-Options are present, the overall SSL/TLS configuration is inadequate, lacking modern protocols, OCSP stapling, and session resumption. No incident response or security policy information is available, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. The cookie consent mechanism is a positive compliance feature, but the absence of secure transport undermines user data protection. The site does not expose sensitive data or vulnerable libraries, but the missing HTTPS significantly impacts trust and security scores.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate immediately to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable and configure modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and implement OCSP stapling and session resumption for improved security and performance.
  3. Publish clear contact information including emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility and user trust.
  4. Add a terms of service page and consider publishing a security policy and incident response contact to improve transparency and compliance.
  5. Regularly audit and update security headers and cookie consent mechanisms to maintain GDPR compliance and protect user privacy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging Google Fonts and jQuery 3.5.1 for frontend functionality. It uses Finsweet Cookie Consent for privacy management. Hosting is via Cloudflare CDN, inferred from HTTP headers, which should provide good performance and availability. However, performance metrics are unavailable, and SSL/TLS configuration is critically lacking, which poses a risk to secure communications. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation clarity and professional design. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical debt appears low, but modernization of security infrastructure is urgently needed to avoid operational and reputational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with laa.law. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review laa.law.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.