Skip to main content

Security report for kyberjoukot.fi

Kyberjoukot Oy · Technology · Finland

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kyberjoukot Oy is a Finnish IT service provider specializing in outsourced IT support, server and cloud services, and IT equipment provisioning for small to medium-sized enterprises. The company positions itself as a flexible and reliable IT partner, enabling clients to focus on their core business while Kyberjoukot manages their IT infrastructure and support needs. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, with clear service offerings and contact channels. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and integrates Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA for analytics and security. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and basic best practices, though some enhancements in security headers and incident response transparency are recommended. Overall, the domain registration and WHOIS data align well with the business claims, indicating legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kyberjoukot.fi

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention kyberjoukot.fi, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for kyberjoukot.fi right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Kyberjoukot operates in the Finnish technology sector, targeting businesses requiring IT outsourcing and support. Their business model focuses on providing tailored IT solutions including user support, server hosting, cloud services, and IT equipment sales. The partnership with the G30 chain suggests a collaborative ecosystem enhancing their market reach. The company is relatively new, founded in 2021, and leverages digital marketing and SEO to attract clients. Their clear contact information and privacy compliance indicate a customer-centric approach. Growth potential exists through expanding service offerings and strengthening security and compliance frameworks.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, the absence of explicit security headers and lack of publicly available security or incident response policies indicate areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. GDPR compliance is evident through privacy and cookie policies. The company should consider publishing a security.txt file and enhancing security headers to improve resilience and transparency. Incident response readiness is not publicly documented, which could be a gap in security culture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Kyberjoukot Oy
Registration number
1740275-1
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kyberjoukot Oy
Description
Kyberjoukot is a Finnish IT service provider supporting businesses by managing IT infrastructure, user support, server and system solutions, and related IT services.
Key services
IT support and outsourced IT services, Server hosting and cloud services, IT equipment and tools, Website and e-commerce hosting, IT security and backup solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Flatsome theme, Ninja Forms
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Mailchimp
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to IT services.
  3. Clear contact information and support options are provided.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and compliant.
  6. No evidence of security policy or incident response info publicly available.
  7. WHOIS data is consistent and transparent.
  8. No suspicious or malicious indicators found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Flatsome theme and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and SEO-optimized infrastructure. It integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking and marketing purposes, and uses Google reCAPTCHA for form security. Hosting appears to be managed by Cloud Center Finland Oy, consistent with WHOIS data. Performance is moderate with lazy loading and prefetching techniques employed. Mobile optimization is good, and navigation is clear and user-friendly. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation and incident response transparency could be improved to reduce risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kyberjoukot.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kyberjoukot.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.