Skip to main content

Security report for kulturlandskap.org

Nordisk KulturlandskabsForbund · Other · Denmark

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nordisk KulturlandskabsForbund is a Nordic non-profit organization dedicated to promoting interest and sustainable use of the Nordic countries' cultural landscapes. The organization operates primarily through membership activities including seminars, excursions, publications, and an active website with forums and resources. The website is built on WordPress with a moderate technical infrastructure and uses common plugins for community engagement and email subscriptions. The site is well designed with good navigation and relevant content for its target audience of Nordic cultural and environmental professionals and enthusiasts. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained, serving a niche non-profit community effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kulturlandskap.org

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
25
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization occupies a niche position in the Nordic cultural and environmental non-profit sector, focusing on education, networking, and preservation of cultural landscapes. Its business model relies on membership fees, events, and publications. The website supports community engagement through forums and social media integration, primarily Facebook. The organization is small-sized, founded in 2014, and operates without a fixed secretariat, relying on volunteer board members across Nordic countries. The digital presence is consistent and professional, though limited in marketing and analytics sophistication. Growth potential lies in expanding membership and digital content offerings.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly configured, and the domain is protected against unauthorized transfers. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or security policy is published, which could hinder rapid response to security events. The site uses common WordPress plugins, which should be regularly updated to mitigate vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance gaps exist due to missing cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small non-profit but could be improved to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to protect against common web attacks.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve trust and preparedness.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nordisk KulturlandskabsForbund
Description
Nordisk KulturlandskabsForbund is a Nordic non-profit organization promoting interest and active use of Nordic cultural landscapes with respect to cultural and natural heritage values. It offers networking, publications, seminars, excursions, and information sharing.
Key services
Annual meetings with seminars and excursions, Publishing journals Lommen and Nordisk Bygd, Maintaining an active website, Supporting and promoting related projects and activities, Encouraging member initiatives and networking
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, jQuery, MediaElement.js, FontAwesome, Icegram Rainmaker plugin, Email Subscribers plugin, Asgaros Forum plugin, Mantra WordPress theme
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Jetpack Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Jetpack Stats (stats.wp.com)
Marketing tools
Icegram Rainmaker (email subscription forms)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Nordic cultural landscape non-profit organization site.
  2. Content is primarily in Danish with some Swedish and Norwegian.
  3. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for forum and email subscriptions.
  4. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite GDPR relevance.
  5. No explicit security policies or incident response info published.
  6. Contact primarily via email and forum; no phone numbers or physical addresses found.
  7. Social media presence limited to a Facebook group link.
  8. No advertising networks detected except Jetpack stats tracking.
  9. Site is well structured with clear navigation and relevant content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 using the Mantra theme and several plugins including Asgaros Forum, Email Subscribers, and Icegram Rainmaker. It uses jQuery and MediaElement.js for frontend functionality and FontAwesome for icons. Hosting appears stable with DNS managed via simply.com and domain registered through Key-Systems GmbH. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is basic with proper meta tags and Open Graph data but could be enhanced. No major technical debt is evident, but security and privacy features could be modernized to align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kulturlandskap.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kulturlandskap.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.