Skip to main content

Security report for kroscloud.com

Krosapp s.r.o. · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kroscloud is a specialized web-based platform offering interactive 3D model viewing and hosting services, primarily targeting users who work with photogrammetry 3D scans and panoramic images. The platform supports advanced features such as multi-layer visualization, audio guides, multilingual interfaces, and protected content access, positioning itself as a niche SaaS provider in the 3D visualization technology sector. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and good content relevance, supporting a positive user experience for its target audience. Technically, the site uses a modern technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and various JavaScript libraries, with integration of Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for marketing and analytics purposes. The site is mobile-optimized and implements GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure, though the absence of explicit security headers and incident response information suggests room for improvement. The lack of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern, as it reduces transparency and trust from a domain registration perspective, despite the professional appearance and functionality of the website. Overall, the site scores well in content quality, technical implementation, and privacy compliance, but domain registration opacity and minor security header gaps moderate the overall trust score.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kroscloud.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention kroscloud.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
42
Employees
0
Customers
42
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
7%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for kroscloud.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Kroscloud operates in the technology sector, focusing on 3D modeling and virtual tour solutions. Its business model is SaaS-based, offering free accounts with premium paid features such as protected content and custom branding. The platform targets professionals in cultural heritage, museums, real estate, and product presentation industries, leveraging photogrammetry technology to create immersive experiences. The company maintains an active social media presence and uses analytics tools to monitor user engagement. The lack of publicly available WHOIS data may indicate privacy protection or recent domain registration, which could be a strategic choice or a transparency gap. The company appears small in size with no public parent or subsidiary affiliations. The platform's niche focus and feature set provide competitive advantages in specialized 3D content hosting and presentation markets.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent banners, indicating awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency in handling security incidents. The use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts introduces moderate tracking but appears compliant with GDPR through consent mechanisms. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the HTML content. The missing WHOIS data reduces trust in domain legitimacy, which is a security consideration. Overall, the security posture is moderate to good but could be enhanced by adding security headers and incident response details.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Consider publishing verified company contact emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to enhance domain registration transparency and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Krosapp s.r.o.
Description
Kroscloud is a web-based 3D viewer and hosting platform specifically designed for sharing photogrammetry 3D scans and panoramic images. It enables creation of interactive 3D presentations with 360° panoramic points of interest, multi-layer visualization, audio guides, and multilingual support. The platform allows easy embedding of 3D models in any website on any device.
Key services
Embeddable 3D viewer, Photogrammetry scan hosting, 360° panoramic image support, Audio guide integration, Multilingual interface, Interactive hotspots and annotations, Multi-layer 3D visualization, Custom branding and white label, Protected scenes, Virtual tour creation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Feather Icons, SweetAlert2, Gijgo, FancyBox, CookieConsent, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, SVG Injector, ProgressBar.js
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Web Browser
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, CookieConsent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. WHOIS data is missing, which is a concern for domain transparency.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via form.
  6. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools.
  7. Good SEO and structured data implementation.
  8. No explicit security headers detected in provided data; recommend improvement.
  9. Social media presence on Facebook and YouTube.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and well-supported technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, Feather Icons, and various JavaScript libraries for UI and interactivity. It integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for user tracking and marketing analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes accessibility basics. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts and use of CDN-hosted libraries. The site lacks a detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. No hosting provider information was identified. Technical risks include missing security headers and reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing maintenance to avoid vulnerabilities. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals effectively but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kroscloud.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kroscloud.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.