Skip to main content

Security report for kopaa.eu

E-commerce · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.kopaa.eu operates as an e-commerce platform specializing in creative and educational kits primarily targeted at children and their parents. The product range includes bath bomb making kits, slime kits, and other craft sets, positioning the business in a niche market focused on educational and creative play. The site is hosted on a modern CDN infrastructure with Mozello CMS, ensuring moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram supports marketing efforts. However, the website lacks explicit privacy and terms of service pages, which are important for compliance and user trust. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but the absence of security headers and detailed privacy information indicates room for improvement. WHOIS data is not publicly available due to EURid privacy policies, which is typical for .eu domains but reduces transparency. Overall, the site appears legitimate and functional with moderate trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kopaa.eu

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates a small-sized e-commerce model selling creative kits for children, targeting parents interested in educational and creative products. The market position is niche with a focus on Latvian customers, as indicated by the Latvian language and local investment support. Revenue streams are primarily from direct online sales. The company leverages social media channels for marketing and uses standard tracking tools like Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. The lack of visible contact information and company registration details limits business transparency. The partnership ecosystem is not evident from the website. Growth indicators include new product offerings and active social media engagement.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism, demonstrating basic compliance with privacy regulations. However, no advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security are detected, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. The login and registration forms are present but no explicit security measures like CAPTCHA or multi-factor authentication are visible. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The absence of a published privacy policy and terms of service is a compliance gap. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not provided, indicating limited security maturity. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with additional controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Enhance login security by adding CAPTCHA and considering multi-factor authentication.
  4. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers for customer support and incident response.
  5. Regularly update and audit third-party libraries and tracking scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Online store selling creative and educational kits such as bath bomb making kits, slime kits, and other craft sets primarily targeting children.
Key services
Sale of creative kits, Online shopping platform
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, Bannerplay, Mozello platform scripts, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Platforms
Mozello CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Engaga
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an active e-commerce store selling creative kits.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to EURid privacy policy.
  3. Cookie consent banner is implemented in Latvian language.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is linked.
  6. Uses HTTPS and modern CDN hosting.
  7. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on main page.
  8. Login and registration forms present but no visible security issues.
  9. No security headers detected in HTML source.
  10. Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel tracking scripts present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Mozello CMS hosted on Amazon CloudFront CDN, leveraging jQuery 2.2.4 and Fancybox 3 for UI components. Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel are integrated for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with deferred loading of scripts and use of CDN resources. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags and canonical links present but no structured data like JSON-LD detected. The site lacks advanced security headers and detailed privacy disclosures. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities include updating jQuery to a more recent version and enhancing accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kopaa.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kopaa.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.