Skip to main content

Security report for kons.fyi

Kons · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kons is a small independent design agency focused on creative digital design and experimentation. The website serves as a minimalist personal landing page highlighting 13 years of design experience and links to related projects and social media. The business model centers on providing unique design perspectives rather than generic solutions, targeting clients seeking usability combined with aesthetics. The market position is that of a boutique design practitioner with a clear value proposition. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Lottie animations for interactive elements, and Umami analytics for privacy-focused user tracking. The site is mobile optimized with good design quality and basic accessibility features. However, no CMS or hosting provider details are evident, and performance is moderate. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS as indicated by canonical URLs, but no explicit security headers are detected. There are no forms or inputs, reducing attack surface, but the absence of privacy and cookie policies, contact information, and security disclosures limits compliance and trust. WHOIS data is unavailable due to TLD restrictions and privacy protections, which is common for small personal domains but reduces transparency. Overall, the website is professional and safe for general audiences but lacks comprehensive privacy and security documentation. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and contact transparency would enhance trust and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kons.fyi

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention kons.fyi, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for kons.fyi right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Kons operates as a small design agency with a focus on creative and value-driven digital design services. The business targets clients valuing unique design perspectives and usability. The website content and linked domains suggest a lean operation without extensive corporate structure or subsidiaries. Revenue streams likely derive from design services and consulting. The presence of a personal CV and related project links indicates a personal brand approach. The partnership ecosystem is minimal, with no clear business partners or subsidiaries identified. Growth indicators are not evident from the website alone.

Security posture

The security maturity level is basic. The website uses HTTPS but lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security. No forms or user input fields reduce risk exposure. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The use of Umami analytics suggests some privacy consideration but overall data protection practices are minimal. The site would benefit from improved security documentation and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add contact information including a dedicated security or abuse email address for incident response.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide more comprehensive navigation cues for improved user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kons
Description
I run design agency and experiment in digital space.
Key services
design agency services, digital experimentation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, WebFont Loader, dotLottie Player, Lottie Interactivity, Umami Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URL https://kons.fyi)
  • No forms or inputs detected to expose sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Umami Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a minimalist personal/business landing page for a design agency named Kons.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to TLD restrictions and privacy protections.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers provided on the website.
  5. External links include personal CV, Twitter (X), and a related design site Queelp.
  6. Uses modern web technologies including Lottie animations and Umami analytics.
  7. No forms or data collection fields detected.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS implied but not confirmed.
  9. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  10. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with modern front-end technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. It uses Lottie animations for interactive UI elements and Umami for privacy-focused analytics. The site is mobile optimized and uses responsive design principles. No CMS or backend platform is detected, suggesting a static or JAMstack architecture. Performance is moderate with no obvious technical debt but could be improved with additional SEO and accessibility enhancements. Hosting provider details are not available. No security headers were detected in the provided data, indicating an area for technical improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kons.fyi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kons.fyi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.