Skip to main content

Security report for konfekt.studio

konfekt.studio · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Konfekt.studio is a small, professional design studio specializing in UI/UX design, landing pages, branding, marketing materials, and Framer development. The company operates on a subscription-based business model, offering comprehensive digital design services to businesses seeking a reliable design partner. The website presents a polished portfolio, clear service offerings, and a founder profile, positioning itself as a niche player in the digital design market. Technically, the site is built on the Framer platform, integrates Google Analytics for tracking, and embeds 3D content via Spline. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good design quality and user experience. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS but lacks several security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, indicating room for improvement in compliance and security posture. Overall, the domain WHOIS data is limited due to TLD restrictions and privacy protection, but the website content and external links support legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include implementing privacy and cookie policies, adding security headers, and publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching konfekt.studio

This scan found 20 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
40
Email security
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
64

Not counted

  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Konfekt.studio targets businesses needing digital design services, leveraging a subscription model to provide flexible, scalable design support. The studio's competitive advantage lies in its clear communication, high expertise, and fast delivery times. Revenue streams are primarily subscription fees. The company maintains an active presence on LinkedIn, Twitter (X), and Dribbble, supporting its marketing and client engagement efforts. The absence of physical addresses or phone numbers suggests a lean operation focused on digital interaction. The partnership ecosystem is limited but includes scheduling via Cal.com. Growth indicators include a professional portfolio and launch promotions. The business model suits startups and SMEs seeking on-demand design expertise without the overhead of full-time hires.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. There is no evidence of a formal security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism, which are important for compliance with GDPR and NIS2 regulations. Data protection practices are minimal, with no cookie consent mechanisms or privacy policy disclosures. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident. The current posture is adequate for a small design studio but should be enhanced to mitigate risks and build client trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Develop and display an incident response contact channel (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email) to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly review and update security practices and compliance documentation to maintain a strong security culture and client confidence.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
konfekt.studio
Description
UI/UX Design, Landing pages, Branding, Marketing materials, Framer development
Key services
Landing Pages, Mobile Apps, Web Apps, Branding, Marketing Assets, Framer Development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Framer, Google Analytics, Spline (3D iframe embed)
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cal.com scheduling
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional design studio offering subscription-based design services.
  2. Content is well structured with portfolio, services, pricing, and founder information.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. WHOIS data is limited due to TLD and privacy; no registrant details available.
  5. No phone numbers or physical addresses found; only email contacts and social media links.
  6. Uses modern technologies including Framer and Google Analytics.
  7. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Framer platform, leveraging modern web technologies and embedding interactive 3D content via Spline. Google Analytics is used for user tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. There is no detected CMS beyond Framer. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but maintains basic usability standards. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of security headers and compliance documentation represents modernization opportunities and technical risks that could impact business operations if unaddressed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with konfekt.studio. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review konfekt.studio.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.