Skip to main content

Security report for kompan.co.uk

KOMPAN LTD · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

KOMPAN LTD operates as a global supplier specializing in the design, manufacture, and installation of outdoor playground and fitness equipment. The company targets municipalities, schools, playground operators, fitness parks, architects, and developers, positioning itself as a key player in the outdoor recreational equipment market. Their website reflects a professional and comprehensive digital presence, showcasing their product range and services with clear branding and user-friendly navigation. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, leveraging Cloudflare for hosting and CDN services. The site demonstrates excellent performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility features, supported by a robust cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy that align with GDPR requirements. The use of multiple analytics and marketing tools indicates a mature digital marketing strategy. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs a detailed cookie consent banner with granular user controls. However, explicit security headers are not detected, and there is no visible security incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, which could be areas for improvement. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain registration transparency, but the overall trust signals and compliance posture suggest a legitimate and well-managed online presence. Overall, KOMPAN LTD's website reflects a strong business and technical foundation with good security and privacy practices. Strategic enhancements in security policy transparency and domain registration visibility would further strengthen their risk profile and stakeholder trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kompan.co.uk

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
32
Security headers
65
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

KOMPAN LTD holds a significant market position as a supplier of outdoor playground and fitness equipment, serving a diverse client base including public sector entities and private developers. Their business model centers on product innovation, manufacturing excellence, and turnkey installation services. The company leverages digital marketing and analytics extensively to optimize customer engagement and market reach. While no direct revenue or subsidiary information is available, the company's large-scale operations and global reach imply a substantial enterprise size. The partnership ecosystem includes major analytics and marketing platforms, enhancing their competitive advantage. The website's comprehensive content and consistent branding support a professional market image, though contact information is limited on the main site, possibly directing users to localized pages.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS encryption and a sophisticated cookie consent framework that supports GDPR compliance. The presence of multiple third-party data processors is transparently disclosed with privacy policy links, indicating strong data protection awareness. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of a published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy represent gaps in security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces transparency but is likely due to privacy protection measures. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from enhanced policy disclosures and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish explicit security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Establish and publicly disclose an incident response policy and dedicated security contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance domain registration transparency if possible, or provide justification for privacy protection to build trust.
  5. Maintain and regularly update privacy and cookie policies to reflect evolving compliance requirements and third-party integrations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
KOMPAN LTD
Description
Solutions to transform your outdoor area. We design, manufacture and install outdoor playground and fitness equipment. Explore our range of services
Key services
Outdoor playground equipment design, Outdoor fitness equipment design, Manufacturing, Installation services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, CookieInformation consent management
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • Privacy policy and cookie policy transparency

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Microsoft Azure
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google, Facebook, LinkedIn, Pinterest, Microsoft Bing, ClickDimensions
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Sleeknote
Marketing tools
Sleeknote, CookieInformation
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Comprehensive cookie consent with detailed categories and processors
  2. Strong privacy and cookie policy presence
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on main page
  4. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks
  5. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure found
  6. No WHOIS data available, possibly due to privacy protection or registry limitations
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies, primarily Next.js and React, ensuring a performant and scalable infrastructure. Hosting appears to be via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with comprehensive SEO meta tags and structured data enhancing search visibility. Cookie consent management is robust, integrating multiple third-party processors with detailed user controls. Performance is fast with preloading and asynchronous script loading. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless architecture. Technical risks are minimal, though the absence of some security headers and incident response mechanisms could pose future operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kompan.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kompan.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.