Skip to main content

Security report for koloo.net

Koloo · E-commerce · Slovakia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Koloo.net operates as a specialized marketing tool provider offering a fortune wheel widget designed to increase conversion rates and sales for e-commerce and hospitality businesses. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings, pricing plans, and client testimonials, positioning itself as a niche player in the marketing technology sector primarily targeting small to medium-sized enterprises. Technically, the site employs a traditional jQuery-based stack with additional plugins for UI and analytics, including Google Analytics and Smartlook for user behavior tracking. While the site uses HTTPS and includes reCAPTCHA for form security, it lacks advanced security headers and uses an outdated jQuery version, which may expose it to vulnerabilities. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although the website content and business presence suggest a legitimate operation. Privacy and terms of service pages are present, but cookie consent mechanisms are missing, indicating partial privacy compliance. Overall, the site demonstrates moderate digital maturity with room for security and compliance improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching koloo.net

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Koloo.net targets e-commerce and hospitality sectors with a SaaS subscription model offering a gamified marketing widget. Its competitive advantage lies in combining marketing gamification with easy integration across platforms like PrestaShop and WordPress. The presence of client testimonials from regional businesses indicates a localized market focus primarily in Slovakia and neighboring countries. The business model relies on tiered pricing plans with increasing features and usage limits, supporting scalability. The company maintains a partnership ecosystem with clients showcased on the site, enhancing credibility. Growth indicators include multilingual support and integration with popular email marketing services like MailChimp. Strategic observations suggest the company could benefit from expanding domain registration transparency and enhancing security posture to strengthen market trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and Google reCAPTCHA protecting contact forms. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces its defense against common web attacks. The use of an outdated jQuery version (1.9.1) introduces potential vulnerabilities that could be exploited. No explicit incident response or security policy information is available, indicating limited transparency in security governance. Privacy compliance is partial, with privacy and terms pages present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. The absence of WHOIS data and domain registration inconsistencies further impact trust. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements in secure coding practices, header implementation, and compliance documentation to mitigate risks effectively.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to enhance web security.
  2. Upgrade jQuery and other third-party libraries to supported, secure versions to eliminate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Verify and publish accurate WHOIS domain registration information to strengthen legitimacy and reduce suspicion.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Koloo
Description
Koloo is a widget/plugin marketing tool (fortune wheel) for websites to increase conversion rate, sales, and profit.
Key services
Fortune wheel widget, Marketing conversion tool, Email collection integration, Facebook integration, Statistics and analytics dashboard
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.9.1, Modernizr, Google Fonts (Open Sans), Tooltipster, Carousel3d jQuery plugin, Google reCAPTCHA v2, Smartlook session recording
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on contact form
  • Input validation on contact form

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Smartlook
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Smartlook
Marketing tools
Koloo fortune wheel widget
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or domain may be unregistered, which is unusual for an active business website.
  3. Website uses HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with email and phone.
  5. Privacy and terms pages are present but cookie consent is missing.
  6. Uses several third-party scripts including analytics and session recording.
  7. Pricing and service details are comprehensive and transparent.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. Site targets small to medium businesses in e-commerce and hospitality sectors.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional front-end stack centered around jQuery 1.9.1 and Modernizr, supplemented by plugins like Tooltipster and Carousel3d for UI enhancements. Google Fonts and Google Analytics are integrated for typography and analytics respectively, alongside Smartlook for session recording. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and uses HTTPS for secure communication. However, the outdated jQuery version and absence of modern security headers indicate technical debt and potential security risks. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts, but no advanced frameworks or CMS detected. The site could benefit from modernization efforts including upgrading libraries, implementing progressive web app features, and enhancing accessibility standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 61/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with koloo.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review koloo.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.